My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/01/1988 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1988
>
11/01/1988 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 4:03:15 PM
Creation date
1/8/2014 11:07:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
11/1/1988
Year
1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.. <br />Council Minutes of 11/1/88 -6- <br />Mr. Tallon stated that the Mayor and Service Director are leading the people <br />to believe that if their leaves were picked up they would be minus police <br />or fire protection, which is not true. The money is in the Service Department; <br />they do not go to fires and they do not do police work - they do the maintenance <br />work of the City of North Olmsted. The Mayor chose to use the money in other <br />areas within the Service Department, which is her preogative; he has no objection <br />to that. The dollars were put into the Service Department and she does what she <br />wants with it. No one should try to lay the blame on Council - that Council did <br />not agree to have leaf pickup., That is not true; the Council gave the Mayor <br />direction and .thought the leaf .pickup program should have been continued all <br />along. The Mayor chose not to do that and spent the Service Department dollars <br />where she felt her priorities were. That is what she is allowed to do but <br />Mr. Tallon wanted everyone to know that it is ridiculous to charge that by <br />having the leaves picked up it was taking away firemen and policemen. <br />Larry Szuhay, 4279 Laurell Lane, reported that Governor Celeste passed a bill this <br />last June, House Bill 592, which will make landfilling in Ohio a very expensive <br />proposition in the future;. material going into solid waste landf ills will be taxed <br />and very expensive. Any thoughts council may have on reinstituting the Leaf <br />Pick-up Program and recycling. is going to help the city in the future. Also, <br />would like to encourage council and Mayor to place a top priority on fixing the <br />roof over the swimming pool; would work with the administration to help get this <br />done. Mayor Petrigac mentioned a way to raise money by selling the parcel of land <br />located between Marquette and Edgepark; about a year and a half ago, he pre- <br />s¢nted a petition, with about 500 signatures, asking,. that that parcel be kept as <br />a "green" area or a recreation area. Would like the Rec Complex roof repaired <br />but would also like to keep this "green" area for the city. <br />Linda Melda, 4286 Porter Road, expressed appreciation to everyone who helped <br />.the Save Our Streets Committee by supporting Issue 26 and voting "yes". <br />Madeline Brookshire, 5140 Hampton Drive, suggested that if the city could not <br />provide leaf pickup for. the entire city, it should at least make a commitment <br />to provide pickup for senior and disabled citizens. Also, there were many state- <br />ments made tonight about the city's lack of money yet the new road was supported. <br />Does not understand this kind of thinking; obviously the city's priorities and <br />the residents priorities are not on the same keel and she has a real problem <br />with that. Mayor Petrigac said that last year, the administration did try to <br />take care of the senior and handicapped citizens by having the scouts and <br />young volunteers rake leaves for them; it was about 857 successful. Will con- <br />tinue to follow up again this year with the same program and would appreciate <br />being given the names of anyone needing help. <br />Al Korosi, 5392 Hampton Drive, discussed Issue 26. Does not know how the ex- <br />tension road. can be built without taking private property. Also, the pre- <br />. liminary survey, to be paid by the city, would cost $200,000 or more, and <br />the city claims it has no money. <br />Lori Davis, 6914 Hampton Drive, congratulated the Mayor on getting the Tree City, <br />USA Award and suggested it be kept under glass since the city is going to ex- <br />change 52,565 oxygen-giving trees for 16,500 trucks, buses and cars and will not <br />be getting another award. <br />Kay Dorazio, 4610 Porter Road, stated that Mr. Sherkow had explained that carbon <br />monoxide pollution revolves around "hot spots" which occur and damage the environ- <br />ment from traffic congestion. The Crocker extension will help the pollution <br />problem by keeping the traffic moving so "hot spots" do not occur. Futhermore, <br />the extension is not a state route - there cannot be buses or trucks on it. <br />To the best of her knowledge, no private property will need to be taken. <br />nC.R ?.M'lPM~PA~!H~ION^iYY*~yyira.'y6"rdPmR.i.:Aq'xitik'SM?}"..~.<.,'.'.. ..• <br />. ,. .. <br />_. <br />~, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.