My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/06/1988 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1988
>
09/06/1988 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 4:03:16 PM
Creation date
1/8/2014 11:07:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
9/6/1988
Year
1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 9/6/88 _2_ <br />Law Director Gareau reported: 1) Law Department is currently preparing for the <br />Halleen Case dealing with the glare from the lights; it is scheduled to be <br />heard next week. An expert has been hired who has taken pictures and readings <br />at the scene and will testify on behalf of the city that there is a glare <br />problem and it violates the. city ordinances. This expert is coming from Michigan, <br />at a cost to the city of $1,500, so the Law Department will be closely monitoring <br />the case scheduling to be sure of his court appearance date. <br />2) Has recently had three meetings with Lhe City of Cleveland and various sub- <br />urban entities who have used the landfill in Garfield Heights; EPA is making <br />a test case of this landfill with respect to the emission of methane gas. The <br />landfill has not been in use since 1972; prior to that time, the City of Cleve- <br />land and various suburbs paid to have their garbage dumped there and now the EPA <br />is asking that they pay for not only monitoring but also correcting the problem; <br />the payment for this could go on for the next thirty years. The City of Cleveland <br />and the various suburbs hope to present a united front on this in order to deal <br />with EPA effectively. Another meeting is scheduled for next weekend; will keep <br />council advised. <br />3) Two cases have been filed against the city; both of them fall under the <br />city's deductible; Law Department has been carrying on investigations with <br />various city departments. One case is McCarthy versus the City of North Olmsted <br />and deals. with a resident who was on her own tree lawn, broke her ankle, and <br />has sued the city for $50,000. The other case is Hirz versus the City of North <br />Olmsted and deals with an accident where a city snow plour hit the side of a van, <br />causing damages; .this is a $125,000 prayer they have .asked for. Also, as pre- <br />dicted at the last council meeting, a suit has been filed by Sunset Memorial <br />Park appealing the decision of council, Another case,. the Drotter Case, with <br />respect to heavy rains flooding a basement and causing damage to carpeting, <br />will be heard next week in Rocky River Municipal Court. While Mr. Drotter has <br />sued for $300, the amount is significant to the extent that it could create a <br />precedent with respect to anyone having water damage when there is an inordin- <br />ate amount of rain. <br />4) Law Director has prepared and presented the ballot language to the Board of <br />Elections for the Crocker/Stearns Extension. This will be a "for" or "against" <br />vote. Has attempted to be as clear as possible and presumably there should be <br />no objection to the language as presented. <br />Mayor Petrigac commented that she was in receipt of a letter from the Mayor of <br />University Heights, one of the cities involved with the landfill, who has done <br />some additional research. He will be setting up a meeting with the state legis- <br />lators because the State of Ohio set up the landfills originally, sanctioned by <br />the EPA at that time, and they are now asking the cities to pay the price for <br />something the state had told the cities to do in the first place. Law Director <br />Gareau commented that this is quite bothersome in that there is no statute of <br />limitations. Waste, and how it impacts on the environment, is a national problem. <br />Why should the City of North Olmsted be asked to pay for something that is a <br />national problem when it was sanctioned by the EPA and the Board of Health. The <br />people who collected the garbage, were paid to dump the garbage, and suddenly <br />have vanished; North Olmsted and the City of Cleveland and other suburbs are <br />being singled out at this time. <br />Finance Director Boyle reported: 1) The Perry Nuclear Power Plant is opening <br />and will start paying public utility personal property tax; they will pay Cuya- <br />hoga County slightly over twenty million dollars. That is 1988 tax; City of <br />North Olmsted will start collecting in 1989 with its share being around $345,000. <br />This will be in additional revenues for next year according to .the County Auditor. <br />Just received this report today and will be forwarding copies to council which <br />show the breakdown to cities, suburbs, townships and villages in Cuyahoga County. <br />,.,,~~,.~ , .a ,.,, , .. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.