Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Special Council Minutes of 3/30/89 <br />-3 - <br />Mrs. Bahas asked if Deerfield was a more bondable project than, for instance, <br />Timber Trails. Finance Director Boyle replied that Deerfield is much more <br />bondable. A rule of thumb that might be used is the life expectancy of the <br />improvement. Parts of Timber Trails may not be bondable at all, but from the <br />engineering studies for Deerf ield, it is all bondable. Also Ranchview is more <br />of an overlay, with a shorter life expectancy, and may not be bondable. This <br />is part of the criteria that was used. Prioritization was first done by the <br />Streets and Drainage Committee, which was then prioritized by available funds <br />and then prioritized by whether a project could be bonded. With the Deerfield <br />Project, a bonding actually more or less guarantees that the project will be <br />addressed whereas an appropriation may not. <br />Service Director Noble asked what particular .part of the Timber Trails Culvert <br />Project would not be fundable through bonds; it is a culvert; it is new con- <br />struction; that is all it is. Mr. Boyle commented that it is more than a cul- <br />vert. Mr. Wilamosky then advised Mr. Boyle that a lot of the work will be done <br />by in-house crews - not totally contracted out. It is going to be a "mixed" <br />project and therefore the issuance of a bond would be dependent upon another <br />entity to follow up on the balance of the work - the other entity being the <br />City of North Olmsted. <br />LEGISLATION: <br />Ordinance No. 89-12 introduced by Mayor Petrigac was given its second reading. <br />An ordinance to make appropriations for current expenses and other expenditures <br />for the City of North Olmsted for the year ending December 31, 1989, as amended. <br />Mr. Wilamosky moved to officially accept the amendments as now listed on Ordin- <br />ance No. 89-12, as amended, and he proceeded to list every change in every <br />department, second by Mr. Bohlmann, unanimously approved. Mr. Wilamosky moved <br />for suspension of rule requiring three readings, second by Mr. Tallon, unani- <br />mously approved. Mr. Wilamosky moved for adoption of Ordinance No. 89-12, as <br />amended, second by Mr. Tallon, unanimously approved. Ordinance No. 89-12 adopted. <br />Mrs. Bahas questioned the inclusion of a full-time clerk in the Fire Department <br />rather than a secretary. Mr. Wilamosky explained the department had been operating <br />with a part-time clerk; she would now go to full-time and if future events proved <br />the need for a seceretary, the issue would be looked at again. <br />Mr. Boehmer commented that he had voted "yes" on Ordinance No. 89-12 because it <br />had to be passed this evening, however he is not happy with it and wanted to go <br />on record as saying so. <br />Mr. Wilamosky stated that he was not entirely happy with the ordinance either but <br />committee tried to make the best of what it had to work with; does not think that <br />anybody is entirely satisfied with it, but based on expenses, the number of pro- <br />jects considered and the amount of revenue, feels that the Finance Committee did <br />a fine job; is proud to serve with the committee because of their dedication in <br />attending a lot of late meetings, sharing a lot of dialogue and discussion and <br />facing a lot of debate. Intends to pursue the bonding for Deerfield at the next <br />Finance Committee Meeting as well as looking at a new rescue squad and equipment <br />for the Fire Department; hopes to have legislation prepared and on the agenda for <br />the April 18th council meeting. <br /> <br />W~9*u+~v n~.+.at} ABM H85h. K _.1 • ~:.tiu4mTr <br />'.. <br />