Laserfiche WebLink
.t '~ <br />T live at 5646 Canterbury Rd, close to the bridge on Butternut Ridge that crosses over <br />480. I was trying to include all members of city council in people I sent this to, but was <br />unable to find their email address' on the city's website. <br />I would like a fence erected to create more of a barrier between people on the sidewalk <br />and the cars on the bridge. The residents that I have talked to and I want this fence for <br />safety reasons to protect the people not in cars, particularly the children that use this <br />bridge daily to get to and from school. <br />I know there have been concerns with putting up this fence. <br />One was with complying with ADA and having the sidewalk be 60" wide so that <br />wheelchairs can turn around. When I measured the exisisting sidewalk, it was not 60" <br />even now. Do we have a variance for the bridge now? Fairview Park has a similar <br />bridge with a fence dividing off the sidewalk on Mastick and 220th, how are they allowed <br />to have their fence? Particularly on the one side, the fence is significantly longer there <br />than it would be on Butternut. The ADA also states that if there is a drop off of more <br />than 6", there is supposed to be some type of barrier to prevent/slow down wheelchairs <br />from going over the edge. The drop between the sidewalk to the road surface is <br />definitely more than 6". <br />Another issue that was brought up was how many children use this bridge and that there <br />were very few children (I think the number was 3) that were seen using the bridge, and <br />they were all with parents. First off, we have a duty to make sure that our city is safe for <br />everyone, regardless if it is one person using it or 1,000, it still needs to be safe. Second, <br />with the Great Northern Multi-Modal Transportation Plan, so much emphasis was placed <br />on encouraging more people to walk and ride bikes in North Olmsted, I would think that <br />a natural step to encourage people to walk and ride bikes would be to make it safer to do <br />so. Third, I just don't understand how such a small number was arrived at. My only <br />plausible explanation of this was someone watch the bridge for a very short period of <br />time that was closer to when the elementary school let out of school versus when the <br />middle school or high school lets out. On Monday of last week, I observed 9 children <br />crossing the bridge without parents as I was riding my bike home from school with my <br />preschooler. I also saw 2 parents walking across the bridge to walk their elementary <br />school aged children home (I stopped and asked them if that is what they were doing). <br />Wednesday of last week, I saw 8 children as I was coming home and the same two <br />parents. Each time, I observed the bridge for less than 5 minutes and it was not in the <br />time period immediately following the release of either the middle school or the high <br />school and was prior to Butternut Elementary being dismissed. I'm sure that if someone <br />were to sit and count for a period of time around when school lets out, the number of <br />students would be much higher. It was suggested that there will be Less people walking <br />once the weather gets colder, but there will be some children that will walk in the winter <br />months. Not all families have the means to have their children get a ride home from <br />school. If anything, we have more of an obligation to protect those children. Crossing <br />the bridge when there is ice involved just makes things more dangerous. What if a child <br />slips on the ice on the sidewalk and falls into the road? The consequences could be <br />