Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 02-21-2012 <br />Arliss Cull, 30220 Sugar Sand Lane said even though the city is saying there is no <br />change, when she starts getting a trash bill on a limited budget it's a change for her. She <br />taught North Olmsted for 25 years and if she changed the rules of her classroom, there <br />would be trouble. Budgeting for this will affect the residents of Cinnamon Woods. <br />Mayor Kennedy said the change in the residents of Cinnamon Woods paying for garbage <br />has nothing to do with Ordinance 2012-5. They are 2 different things. Change is <br />something the schools ask us to do all of the time. Every property owner has to change <br />when a levy passes and they have to change their budget. He is talking about the <br />Ordinance -there is no change in residential. <br />Kay Varga, 7161 Lilac Court said the Mayor did this to them right after they got the big <br />blue expensive cans for automation. They are not allowed to sit outside, so they take up <br />room. Mayor Kennedy said the city did not pay for those cans. If she has to pay for <br />garbage, his idea would be the city negotiates a deal and then they can do whatever they <br />want. If they want to go back to the old way, they can do that. Keep in mind that some <br />associations pay more for garbage than the city does. Their association negotiates their <br />deal, not the city. Now that he is aware that some associations pay more for garbage than <br />the city does, he said he told Republic that he is going to negotiate as a city and he is <br />going to pass that on to anyone else that pays for their garbage - if they want it. If they <br />don't want it, they can negotiate any deal they want or they don't even have to go with <br />Republic. <br />Robert Burke, 7572 Willow Woods said the Mayor states there is no change in the <br />~, <br />Ordinance, but the way he reads it 941.01(c)1 originally said all residential structures. <br />~° The revised copy says all residential structures located on dedicated streets. So, there is <br />a change. Gareau said that is correct. The language was added during the committee <br />process. He thinks it was Council's attempt to make the language clearer, but not to <br />change the scope of the Ordinance because the requirement is still that you had to be on <br />the dedicated right of way. That's what the Code has read for quite a few years. Burke <br />said the city is paying $14.83, each of the 16 streets that are not dedicated cannot <br />negotiate with a big company and get a decent deal. He asked the Mayor if he can help. <br />Kennedy said as he stated to the last resident, when he met with Republic he brought up <br />that the city is going to negotiate the best passible deal and then Republic is going to give <br />that option to Cinnamon Woods or Viewpoint or whoever wants that deal. However, if <br />they do not want to go with Republic -like Barton Woods uses dumpsters -they don't <br />have to. It's their choice to go with the option the city has negotiated with them or not. <br />Burke said their hydrants are not flushed by the city. If there is a fire and the hydrants <br />don't work, they have to pay someone to flush the hydrants, replace the hydrant, etc. <br />This is all because this is a private road. He said they are all upset because all they get <br />are police, fire and garbage. When one of those is taken away, it's a blow to them. <br />Kennedy said he understands. This is an issue that's a loser issue for him because it's not <br />a political issue nor does he have a political will to do this. It's not a financial issue <br />where he is looking to cut money and trying to cut Cinnamon Woods. This is a legal <br />issue. The legal issue is should the city be going on private streets? The city should have <br />never been. That is the reality of the situation, and he has a fiduciary responsibility to <br />,~:. <br />make sure he does the right thing. <br />7 <br />