Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF ~ MEETING OF Tf~ COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF 1VDRTH OLMSTED <br />SEPTEMBER 7, 1993 <br />Present: Council President Boehdmer, Council Members Babas, Leonard, Lind, <br />McKay, Musial, Nashar, Sarnger <br />Also Present: Mayor Ed Boyle, Law Director Michael Gateau, Finance Director <br />James Burns, Clerk of Council Barbara Semen <br />Council President BoehmMer called the meeting to order at 8 p.m. in Council <br />Chambers, 5200 Dover Center Road, North Olmsted, Ohio. <br />Members of the audience were invited to join Council in reciting the Pledge of <br />Allegiance to the Flag. <br />The minutes of the Council meeting of August 17, 1993 were approved as written. <br />Mr. Boehmer arnlounced that Plam~.ing Commission Chairperson Brian Gorris would <br />present a report on the Master Plan. <br />Mr. Gorris explained that approximately three years ago the Charter was changed <br />to provide for the development of a Master Plan which would be updated every four <br />years. The Planning Commission was charged with the responsibility of developing <br />the Master Plan, and the Plan has now been completed. The Cuyahoga County <br />Planning Omission assisted the city Plarming Commission in this task. The <br />planning body consisted of both Planning Commissions, Assistant Law Director <br />Dubelko, Councilman Lind, City Eaigineer Deichm~m and Building Cammissi.oner <br />Conway. The steps involved in the formulation process were as follows: <br />1. A public meeting was held on July 23, 1991 and was attended by approximately <br />50 residents. From the comments given at this meeting, 23 community goals were <br />developed. <br />2. A review of the community as a whole was done. This included a demographic <br />analysis, a study of the existing land use and development constraints, an <br />inventory and assessment of existing commercial and residential properties, a <br />commercial-industrial market analysis and a review of the infrastructure and <br />community facilities. <br />3. Four large geographic areas were identified which the planning body deemed to <br />require further study because these areas were prime for development. The four <br />focus areas were: Brookpark Road east, a triangle roughly bounded by Brookpark, <br />I480 and Great Northern Blvd.; the new S. R. 252 corridor, which is the extension <br />of Great Northern Blvd. north of Columbia Road east to old Columbia Road. and west <br />to Canterbury; Stearns Road from I480 to Westlake; Stearns Rom west', which is <br />the most underdeveloped portion of the city. <br />4) A final development plan was prepared that made recommendations for resolving <br />the various redevelopment issues relative to the four focus areas. In addition, <br />recozm~end,ations were made for the development of the 51 largest vacant parcels of <br />land within the city. <br />5) Formulation of a strategic management plan which restated the 23 community <br />goals and recommended nearly 80 strategies for achieving the goals. <br />