Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 8/19/97 <br />b. Ordinance 97-69, dealing the annexation of property belonging to Christ the King <br />Church. The committee recommended approval. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />Angelo Skoulis, 24732 Mitchell Drive, spoke as president of the Parkwest Homeowners <br />Association and a representative of C.A.R.S., Citizens Against Retail Saturation. <br />C.A.R.S. is an organization that is opposed to any rezoning of additional land for retail <br />use. The members are against passage of Ordinance 97-76 which would rezone Parcel E. <br />Mr. Skoulis wished to remind Council of some of the reasons that he has previously given <br />for opposing this issue: <br />• This is not the developer's first attempt to rezone the land--it is now his sixth attempt. <br />One of the attempts was successful when the residents sat down with Biskind <br />Development for seven months to negotiate an agreement on items such as buffering, <br />landscaping and zoning to office building use. <br />• Shortly after the land was rezoned for office building use, the Planning Commission, of <br />which he was a member, developed a Master Plan. It was agreed that Parcel E should <br />not ever be rezoned again unless it reverted back to its original zoning of residential <br />use. City Council adopted the Master Plan. <br />Had the residents known what they know now, they would never have agreed to the <br />rezoning of the land to office use. They learned by experience. By rezoning the land to <br />office use, the developer was given an even more reasonable use of his land than originally <br />zoned. This was done at his request. Last year, the developer came back to Planning <br />Commission with still another request for an even higher zoning of general retail claiming <br />there was no demand for office space in North Olmsted. Yet, all around us, other <br />communities are building offices. Mayor Boyle has sent several good prospects who <br />wanted a location for office buildings to Biskind Development and nothing ever came of <br />it. Biskind Development does not want to develop this land--they only want to sell the <br />land to Forest City Enterprises who plan to put up a Home Depot and another shopping <br />strip right behind the residents' homes. On the surface, Ordinance 97-76 appears to be a <br />very simple ordinance of a very simple issue. It proposes to change the zoning on Parcel <br />E from office buildings to general retail use. But there are other issues involved. First, do <br />we really need any more land zoned for retail use? Ten years ago, the Planning <br />Commission, chaired by current Finance Director James Burns, turned down this same <br />developer because they felt that North Olmsted already had too much land zoned for <br />retail. Is this developer entitled to a higher zoning on this land? He had reasonable use of <br />the land when he purchased it, but we gave him an even higher zoning. Our country's <br />court system has ruled that municipalities cannot be forced to give a landowner a higher <br />zoning if he has reasonable use of the land. This developer already has more than <br />reasonable use of the land. The residents have been fighting this developer for eleven <br />years and are getting tired of it. The value of homes in North Olmsted have not kept pace <br />with other surrounding communities because of so much retail development. Residents <br />who recently purchased homes in the Parkwest development did so with the understanding <br />that Parcel E would be developed as office building space. Now they are worried about <br />their investment in their homes. The residents understand that the developer will attempt <br />7 <br />