Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 6/3/97 <br />3) Last week Council and the administration held an open discussion on the AT&T <br />~,,, proposal to place an antenna in Clague Park. The discussion was to continue this evening <br />during caucus; however, since there was not enough time, the Mayor is relinquishing his <br />report time so that Council can discuss or ask questions of the AT&T representative Mr. <br />Kevin McGrath. Mr. McGrath came to the microphone and answered the following <br />questions: <br />a. Mr. Limpert asked how large of a radius did AT&T have to work with to choose a <br />location. Mr. McGrath said the distance normally spaced between towers was <br />approximately 2 to 2 1/2 miles, depending on various criteria such as the topography and <br />large structures that might interfere with the line of sight between towers. <br />b. Mayor Boyle commented that there were "grids" across the city. Given that there was <br />an optimal spot for the antenna in the center point of the grid, he wondered how large the <br />radius was around that central point. Mr. McGrath said that the engineers identify a <br />"search ring" and it is desirable for the antenna to be in the center of that search ring. <br />However, as long as the antenna is located within that search ring, it will provide minimum <br />coverage which will guarantee that AT&T Wireless will fulfill its mandate under the <br />federal licensing agreement that they will be able to provide service to all customers within <br />that area. <br />c. Mr. O'Grady asked a question to help clarify Mr. Limpert's question: What other <br />locations other than Clague Park would be available that would still allow AT&T to fulfill <br />their obligations under the licensing agreement? Mr. McGrath said that because the area <br />was residential and ideally they like to locate the antennas on tall structures, the building <br />of a tower in the park is the best location engineering-wise and for the city. Mr. O'Grady <br />asked if it was possible to locate the tower on a private residential lot. Mr. McGrath said <br />it was possible, but the city still does have the right of control over location of an antenna <br />structure under its zoning laws. Mr. O'Grady agreed that the Telecommunications Act of <br />1996 does not permit cities to prohibit the towers, but cities can regulate their location. <br />d. Mr. Limpert felt that his question still had not been answered. He asked how far it <br />would be before a location was out of the "sweet spot." Mayor Boyle asked the diameter <br />of a search ring. Mr. McGrath said the diameter of a search ring is not a set size. The size <br />is determined by the size of the coverage area that is needed. As sites are filled in <br />surrounding the particular antenna site, that dictates the size of the search ring. He <br />displayed a map prepared by the AT&T engineers which illustrated why the antenna <br />needed to be in the area of the park. <br />e. Mr. McKay said that antennas are also being installed on the Victoria Park Apartments <br />and the corporate center, and these buildings are within Less than a half mile from each <br />other. Why are these two sites so close together? Mr. McGrath said that the need for <br />antennas in an area is not only determined by topography and interference but also by the <br />amount of user traffic that will be passed along the network through the sites. Around the <br />mall and the intersection of two major highways and a heavily commercial area will require <br />more sites. Mr. McKay asked for an explanation of how the antennas work. Mr. <br />McGrath said all antennas accept and pass along calls as users pass by the sites. As people <br />drive down the road, their calls will be passed from one site to the next in order to provide <br />quality of service. In response to a question by Mr. Limpert, Mr. McGrath agreed that <br />2 <br />