My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/20/1998 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1998
>
10/20/1998 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:41:54 AM
Creation date
1/9/2014 11:27:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
10/20/1998
Year
1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 10/20/98 <br />., discharge division heads. But, if the director discharges the division head, that is not <br />~w appealable to Council. If the Mayor discharges a division head, then that removal must be <br />upheld by atwo-thirds vote of Council. The Supreme Court recognized it was a strange <br />ruling, but they believed it was how the Charter read. (It may be a good idea to look at <br />this section of the Charter during the next Charter review.) <br />4) We have received the brief in the case that challenged the constitutionality of our tree <br />ordinance. The city's brief will be filed within nine days. <br />Finance Director Copfer: 1) Amended substitute House Bill 426 was passed. This bill <br />allows a taxing authority to establish a reserve balance account for each of the following <br />three purposes: <br />1. Budget stabilization, which is limited and cannot exceed 5% of the General Fund's <br />revenue for the proceeding year. (Ours would be $800,000.) <br />Z. Payment of claims under aself-insurance program. <br />3. Payment of claims under a retrospective ratings plan for workers' compensation. <br />These are added to already allowable purposes for creating a special revenue fund for the <br />payment of the accumulation of employees' earned but unused benefits such as vacation <br />and sick Leave, and capital projects funds for the purpose of accumulating resources to <br />acquire, construct or improve fixed assets of a subdivision. The specific purpose/project <br />must be determined--fixed assets must be specifically identified. (Council, back in 1995, <br />passed a resolution supporting the legislation that created these two purposes.) These are <br />some of the things that need to be considered when talking about the $350,000 from our <br />workers' comp refund or other monies that might become available, such as an excessive <br />estate tax. An argument could be made for all of them except the workers' comp because <br />our city is premium based, not retrospective. <br />• Budget stabilization. Everyone knows what the predictions for the economy are. The <br />state is already seeing a decrease in revenues. The City of Cleveland has already taken <br />defensive strategies to protect for that. We know what is happening in the world <br />markets, which do impact even North Olmsted. <br />• The fixed assets are very important to plan for capital projects that we might be <br />considering instead of borrowing for them. <br />• The self-insurance. The city is self-insured for hospitalization, and there has been <br />some discussion as far as not really having adequate reserves in those accounts. <br />Council should be thinking about all these issues in preparation for the discussion on how <br />to use the workers' comp rebate. <br />2) The auditors will be completing their on-site field work this week. There is no firm date <br />for final issuance, but she would want it sooner as opposed to later because GASB, the <br />Governmental Accounting Standards Board, regulations came out at the end of last month <br />on disclosures for the year 2000. This will necessitate more field work to be done by <br />special auditors that are adept at testing specific 2000 issues. We did include some of this <br />information in our SEC filing; however, she would prefer to get 1997 to bed and deal with <br />these new disclosures in the 1998 audit, which will be coming up soon. <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.