My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/01/1998 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1998
>
09/01/1998 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:41:56 AM
Creation date
1/9/2014 11:27:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
9/1/1998
Year
1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 9/1/98 <br />Mr. Miller, Chairperson of the Transportation Committee: 1) The committee met on <br />August 24 to discuss Ordinance 98-90. Present were committee chairman Miller, <br />committee members McKay and Limpert; Councilpersons Nashar, O'Grady, Gareau and <br />Saringer. Ordinance 98-90 provides for the removal of aright-of--way sign and the <br />installation of a stop sign in its place at the intersections of Maplehurst and Westlawn <br />Drive. City Traffic Engineer Griffith noted in a memo that he recommended the yield sign <br />be replaced with a stop sign. The committee recommended approval. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />Sharon Lepore, 5551 Quail Run, addressed Council regarding Resolution 98-82 <br />concerning the Crocker-Stearns extension. She and her neighbors have closely followed <br />this project through the years and have voiced their feelings and concerns to Council. <br />They have never asked Council to stop this project because they know the citizens of <br />North Olmsted voted for it. They have come to Council only to ask for protection from <br />the road. They are now concerned that people who have not followed this issue as closely <br />as they have will be misled by the resolution. Mrs. Lepore noted that the EPA wetlands <br />study is not yet complete, and the project cannot move forward until its completion. This <br />resolution cannot change that. She feels the resolution may lead other citizens to believe <br />that the city and/or Council has the power to control when this project can begin. It is her <br />belief that this resolution cannot control the EPA and that the people of North Olmsted <br />should be informed. Instead of the legislation, she believes it would be better to inform <br />people that the decision rests with the EPA, a federal government agency. Mrs. Lepore <br />said some citizens are wondering if the funds for North Olmsted's portion will be available <br />in 2001 and whether taxes will be raised to pay for the project. Mrs. Lepore read the <br />following letter from Jeffrey Tasse, 5522 Quail Run, who could not attend the meeting <br />because of a previous commitment: "Dear Council Members, we of Pheasant's Walk- <br />Quail Run Civic Association are puzzled by Resolution 98-82 which two Councilmen have <br />introduced to maintain the current schedule of the Crocker-Stearns extension. This <br />resolution mirrors the failed Resolution 97-12 introduced last year by the same two <br />Councilmen. It seems like a waste of valuable Council time. The Crocker-Stearns project <br />eventually was approved after two votes by North Olmsted voters in 1987 at a time when <br />they expected equal cooperation from Westlake in extending Route 252 north of Lorain to <br />meet a widened Columbia Road. Have we been duped since Westlake has no intention of <br />widening Columbia? Notice that Westlake, like the other progressive communities such as <br />Chardon, successfully fights to keep megastores like K-Mart and Wal-Mart out of their <br />towns while we raze our remaining natural resources to welcome them. Westlake, Bay <br />Village, Avon Lake and other neighboring communities all anticipate our bulldozing of <br />natural forest at the west end of North Olmsted for the extension of Crocker-Stearns as <br />long as it benefits from their development. They retain the green space while we build <br />another road. Has anyone ever proven the benefit of Crocker-Stearns to North Olmsted? <br />It does little except introduce a major concrete corridor into the front and back yards of <br />our neighbors. Once again, Councilman George Nashar shows clear thinking when he <br />opposes the resolution since it implies the city controls the timetable of the project. It <br />`'~" does not. And, therefore, we question the motives behind the resolution. We have read <br />5 <br />,,~,_ ~ ,. ~~ ~.~.. ......~, ~r~_ _.. ,. .,, .. , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.