Laserfiche WebLink
Public Hearing of 4/21/98 <br />dedicated right-of--way. It is his understanding the Cinnamon Woods residents bring their <br />refuse out to the public right-of--way (Cinnamon Way). The other streets are not <br />dedicated and are not built to city standards and there would be a question of who is <br />responsible for the heavy BFI trucks going on those streets. Mr. Grendell again stated <br />that the streets were built to city specifications, but after comments from Mr. Bohlmann as <br />to a 60 foot right-of--way and stand-up curbing, he said that they do not meet the code. <br />They are not asking for any special treatment. <br />Mrs. Kasler asked Mr. Elliott about the "verbal agreement" to pick up trash. Mr. Elliott <br />said a verbal commitment was made about five years ago that trash would be picked up at <br />the curb in front of each residence. Mr. McKay said, if that is what is happening, we are <br />going to have a lot of problems because we will have to pick up rubbish on every <br />substandard street in the city. Mr. Bohlmann said he would call BFI to find out what was <br />going on. If they are picking up on those non-dedicated streets, they are not supposed to <br />do so. Also, the city will not pay for it. He does not know where the verbal agreement <br />came from. He did not participate in such a verbal agreement. Mr. Grendell said he had <br />not participated in a verbal agreement, and they would abide by whatever the codes and <br />requirements are. <br />On another issue, Mr. Grendell noted that the new development will generate about <br />$250,000 in property taxes at build-out at the current tax rate based on 86 units. <br />Ann Farrell, 30781 Peppermill Court, said that this proposal would directly affect the <br />Cinnamon Woods residents because until this point they had no idea what was going to be <br />proposed to be built behind them. They paid premium prices for their wooded lots and <br />would like to hear from the builders and Council if their tree line is going to be maintained. <br />Mr. McKay asked if she had a contract with the builder. Mrs. Farrell said yes; but when <br />she went to Mr. Puzzitello to ask what was going to occur with the trees, he said he <br />would have no way of stopping it if the city required them to be removed. She is at the <br />meeting to represent the street and to bring that to Council's attention because she thinks <br />conservation is very essential. Mrs. Saringer explained that these issues would be <br />addressed at the Planning Commission. Mr. Grendell noted that there are no lots in the <br />current Cinnamon Woods. This is a condominium association, and the people own their <br />own units. There is common ground in the back which is owned by the association. <br />Every one of the residents has an undivided interest in it. The builder has no right to cut <br />down any trees north of this line. Any trees that are on the common land will remain <br />because it belongs to the residents. They will also try to save trees because it is good for <br />marketing. The condominium document they received upon purchase informed them that <br />the 18 acres was additional land that could be added to the existing Cinnamon Woods. It <br />is a recorded document of public record. So that they do not bear the extra burden of <br />these services, a separate association will be formed for the new units. The trees on their <br />property are not going to be touched. Mrs. Farrell said that Olmsted Township had told <br />her the land would be developed as private single dwellings. Mr. McKay said he had been <br />with the city for a long time, and if it required any developer to cut down trees, that would <br />2 <br />I <br />