My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/07/1999 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1999
>
12/07/1999 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:42:07 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 8:26:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
12/7/1999
Year
1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 12/7/1999 <br />Mr. Limpert, member of the Recreation Committee gave a minority report: 1) First of <br />all, he would like to say that he respects the decision of the majority of the committee. <br />~' But he did some research, and this is the first time in 40 years that this Council ever had a <br />piece of legislation assigned to one committee and, when the outcome from the <br />committee was 2 to 1 in favor, that it was then reassigned to another committee that <br />might have a different outlook on it. The decision of the compromise is probably a very <br />good compromise. His concern is that, when an offer is given, it more or less stands <br />unless acounter-offer or, in this case, a request to amend the contract is given. He <br />opposed amending the contract due to the concern that it is possible for Coke to change <br />their mind and decide that, since they are already $75,000 better than their competition <br />without an additional $25,000 thrown in, or, if a personnel change were to take place at <br />Coca-Cola or something like that, that we would be jeopardizing the additional $25,000. <br />That was his reason for dissenting on the amendment. <br />President Saringer reminded Mr. Limpert that Council had received a written opinion <br />from the Law Director that the procedure had been proper. <br />Law Director Gareau said he wished to comment so as to properly characterize the <br />inclusion of the gift portion in the ordinance. It has to be understood as a matter of <br />historical perspective that there wasn't really an issue until the issue was raised, and <br />probably appropriately raised. From the standpoint of not improper but rather as an issue <br />of should these two issues be separated as far as the appearance of propriety, he believes <br />so. He recommends that the section be removed from the contract in order to handle the <br />two issues separately. That is what he was asked at the end of the committee meeting, <br />and he strongly recommends it. <br />Mr. O'Grady, chairperson of the Finance Committee: 1) The committee met on <br />December 6. Present were committee members O'Grady, Limpert and Kasler; members <br />of Council Gareau, Miller, McKay and Nashar; the Mayor; directors of Finance, Service <br />and Safety. Agenda items were as follows: <br />• Ordinance 99-157 amends Section 12 of Ordinance 98-32 which establishes rates of <br />compensation for various administrative and legislative personnel so as to provide <br />updated hourly rates for part-time employees of the Parks and Recreation <br />Department. This amendment establishes a wage range for part-time personnel from <br />a minimum wage up to $16 per hour. An added benefit of this ordinance is the <br />establishment of a consistent part-time grouping of wages between both the <br />Recreation Center and Springvale. The committee unanimously recommended <br />approval of Ordinance 99-157. <br />• Ordinance 99-158 makes and transfer appropriations for current expenses and other <br />expenditures for the city during the year ending December 31, 1999. Discussions <br />highlighted excess funds in Finance, Safety and other departments due to staff <br />vacancies, which monies were then moved to address shortages in the fund transfer <br />line item of General Administration. Another significant change was the additional <br />charge of $1,350,445 to the Sanitary Sewer Fund. Previously, all revenue for the <br />~t= Sewer Fund was split at the point of entry. Current changes which have been <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.