My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/1999 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
1999
>
11/16/1999 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:42:08 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 8:26:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
11/16/1999
Year
1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(~ <br />-.. <br />Council Minutes of 11/16/1999 <br />,, is on the main streets in North Olmsted and to the business parking lots in the area. <br />~;,. Again, as I have said before, I believe that in the best interest of the community that a <br />portion of the money acquired from the Coca-Cola contract be used to fund the skate park <br />project. I know I speak for many, these athletes need somewhere safe to do their sport. I <br />hope that you will consider this when voting on this issue. Thank you for your <br />consideration and time." <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, said he had only a few minutes to read the <br />legislation regarding the Coca-Cola contract but personally felt it was appropriate <br />because the skateboard park is going to be on public property. He believes the City of <br />North Olmsted is going to be liable as far as the insurance on that property and <br />everything else that deals with that property as it is a recreational activity. He believes <br />that another piece of legislation will be necessary to earmark the contribution because <br />those dollars cannot legally be given to the city except through the General Fund or <br />through being earmarked. Mr. Lambert said he felt the issue of locking in the price of the <br />product for the duration of a 10-year contract needs to be addressed. He said he would be <br />asking the question if the city is getting enough money for that period of time. Mr. <br />Limpert said he believed Mr. Lambert was correct in that the pricing was not set. <br />However, Coca-Cola will be receiving 65% of every dollar that goes into the machines <br />and he believes their profit is in volume. He feels sure they will be pricing it in what they <br />feel is a competitive mode. Mrs. Saringer said she believed the contract was written so <br />that the city could set the price. Mr. Lambert said, if he were signing the contract, he <br />would want the wholesale cost or a cap put on increases so that the city can control the <br />increases. <br />David Scott, 23954 Delmere Drive, said he would strongly agree with the letters that <br />were read. The skate park sounds like a really good thing for the kids. On another <br />matter, he would like to voice his opinion about any proposed mandatory helmet laws. <br />He feels that helmets are readily available and are inexpensive. That would be a good <br />item left up to the parents to decide whether their kids would want to wear them or if the <br />parents would like them to wear them. He is the father of three boys ages 14, 13 and 8. <br />So far, they haven't had any trouble or injuries and have not fallen off bikes. He rides <br />bikes and performs wheelies with no helmet. He personally does not know anyone who <br />received a head injury from riding a bike, and he does not agree with the idea it takes a <br />village to raise a child. He would strongly oppose any mandatory helmet laws. <br />Dave Schrembeck, 6684 Barton Road, said his family's decision to stay in this <br />community was made because of city services and the recreational facilities. He has <br />personally become involved in the skate park and believes it is his responsibility as a <br />citizen of the community to help promote recreational facilities. As a business owner, he <br />does not want the responsibility of asking the skaters to leave his property or of the <br />skaters' safety while on his property. It is easy to complain about things, but it is another <br />matter to put your money where your mouth is and get out and actively do something <br />` about it. He has done that and wants to stress to Council he feels they should support the <br />~,, <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.