My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/18/2000 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
07/18/2000 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:45:21 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 9:50:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
7/18/2000
Year
2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 7/18/2000 <br />brief was filed today, and we were served with the Chamber's brief today. Hopefully, <br />Judge Nugent will render a decision on that claim sometime soon. <br />3) The Law Director continues to be involved in bus line contract negotiations. <br />Finance Director Copfer: 1) This evening Council received the May revenue and <br />expenditure reports. <br />2) Before Council this evening are Ordinances 2000-84 through 2000-92 providing for <br />the retirement of outstanding notes through issuing long-term bonds. As was discussed <br />last week, there are no new monies being requested in these ordinances and they are <br />needed before Council returns in September. Therefore, she is asking for suspension of <br />the rules requiring three readings and committee review. <br />Councilman Gareau asked Mayor Musial if he had a status report on the Charter Review <br />Commission. If their recommendations are to be placed on the ballot in November, there <br />are deadlines to be met and Council is going on vacation during August. Mayor Musial <br />said the commission needs one more meeting to conclude the discussions and make <br />determinations, and he believes that meeting will take place later this month. He is not <br />sure whether they are going to ask for a special meeting or will postpone it to the primary <br />election next year. <br />Mr. Miller, chairperson of the Transportation Committee: 1) On July 11, the <br />Transportation Committee met to discuss a letter from resident James DePauw <br />recommending that "No Turn on Red School Days" signs be changed to "Turning <br />Vehicles Yield to Pedestrians." In attendance were committee members Miller, McKay <br />and Gareau; Councilpersons Kesler, Nashar, Limpert and O'Grady. Review of the <br />response from the traffic engineer, Mr. Griffith, indicated that such a sign makes no <br />difference to drivers in how they respond and that ORC Section 4511.13, A and C and <br />4511.46 requires drivers to yield to pedestrians in a crosswalk and no sign is required. <br />Mr. Griffith further recommended that no change be made at the three intersections <br />involved. The committee thanks Mr. DePauw for his input, however, it appears that this <br />recommendation is not in the city's best interest. The committee voted unanimously to <br />table the issue. <br />2) On Monday, July 17, the Transportation Committee met at Clague Park. In attendance <br />were committee members Miller, McKay and Gareau; Councilpersons Kasler and <br />Saringer; traffic engineer Larry Griffith; crossing guard Sandy Weir. The committee <br />observed the crosswalk and noticed that rarely would traffic stop even with the existing <br />signage and markings. One resident with two children approached, thankful that the <br />situation was being reviewed, and remarked that she still considers the crossing very <br />dangerous. The committee then proceeded to the picnic shelter where they discussed the <br />crossing and a similar crossing on Canterbury at Sweetbrier. Both are unlike any other <br />crosswalks in the city. Mrs. Sandy Weir, the school crossing guard at Canterbury and <br />Sweetbrier, indicated her concerns. She stated that people routinely ignored the signage <br />and oftentimes even speed up when they first see the yellow lights thinking that they may <br />be about to turn red. She felt we may have had a safer crosswalk without the signs than <br />with the current signage as she felt the current signage may lead to a false sense of <br />~. security leading to a possible vehicle/pedestrian collision. There was unanimous <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.