My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/08/2000 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
03/08/2000 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:45:29 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 9:50:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
3/8/2000
Year
2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 3/8/2000 <br />would probably not be done until 2002. However, he plans to send the street sweeper <br />`~' down to take the debris off the street. Also, the service crews will take care of patching <br />F the holes which should allow the street to last for another year or so. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, asked if Councilman O'Grady would be attending a <br />National League of Cities conference and if he would be reimbursed for the trip. Mr. <br />O'Grady replied that he was attending the conference in Washington D. C. from Sunday <br />through Tuesday of next week and the city will pay for the trip. He is a member of the <br />policy committee of the National League of Cities. This committee sets policy on issues <br />that affect municipalities throughout the United States, and he will represent the interests <br />of the City of North Olmsted and the State of Ohio. Mr. Lambert said he felt that, when a <br />Council member goes on a trip, it should be a recommendation of the committee as a <br />matter of protocol. Also, he felt there should be a resolution to reimburse with some <br />discussion as to the cost that is expended. He believes this should be done even though <br />the funds have been appropriated. He suggested Mr. O'Grady give his thoughts some <br />consideration just to appear to be above-board. President Saringer noted that, when the <br />notices regarding these meetings are received, she does bring it up before Council to find <br />out if there is anyone interested in going--it is discussed. Mr. O'Grady took exception to <br />Mr. Lambert's comment that he should do something to "appear" to be above-board. <br />Those choice of words are disappointing to him. As a point of honor, as a point of <br />integrity and as a point of honesty, he always does everything to the utmost of his ability <br />to be completely open and honest and above-board. Mr. O'Grady asked the Law Director <br />to comment on whether Council is doing something improperly in the way they conduct <br />business. Law Director G-areau did not agree with Mr. Lambert's suggestion to set aside <br />the fact that Council has appropriated money for these types of expenditures. If there is <br />sufficient money appropriated, then by acquiescence the members of Council agree that a <br />person should attend. He doesn't see anything wrong with that--all departments have line <br />items for organization and travel. The funds have been appropriated and can be <br />expended if it's appropriately expended by virtue of it being expended for a municipal <br />purpose. Obviously, what Mr. O'Grady is doing is for a municipal purpose. <br />Jim Burns, 3978 Dover Center Road, the former Finance Director, said he wanted to <br />follow up on comments made by Mr. McKay. It is true that a huge amount of <br />infrastructure work was compressed into a shorter period of time than originally <br />scheduled. As a result, the outstanding debt of the city was substantially increased. <br />Apparently, the residents of Chapel Hill and Sanders wish the city had borrowed some <br />more money. When the street program was started, the streets were broken down into <br />basically three categories: (1) good streets that were worth saving but had some <br />problems; (2) good streets that were on their way to falling apart; (3) streets that already <br />had fallen apart. The priority was given to the first and third categories in order to fix the <br />streets that weren't working and to keep the streets that were in good shape from <br />becoming streets that weren't working. Unfortunately, streets like Sanders and Chapel <br />Hill fell in that middle category and had to wait. At a point in time, the city got to the <br />point where more money could not be borrowed without jeopardizing the financial <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.