Laserfiche WebLink
Public Hearing <br />Ordinance 2040-13 <br />~,,~, of West 231 Street. During a Board of Zoning Appeals meeting, an engineer brought up <br />the issue of how much land area is needed to transmit the signal. At this time, the city <br />does not have anyone with that expertise to represent us. We need to have provision for <br />land in the eastern part of the city. If there is a void of land available and a developer <br />says the area of Great Northern is not sufficient and files a complaint, they would <br />probably win. <br />Presidem Saringer and Councilman Nashar both felt that I-480 would be a good place for <br />the towers. Law Director Gareau said that, if ODOT says no, then they can't be put up. <br />Mark Bressler, Great Northern Mall manager, asked if this could be imposed upon a <br />property owner? Law Director Gareau said all this is saying is in the city we have an <br />Overlay District. We are making reasonable accommodations for the towers. However, <br />the developer must get the property owners' approval to construct the towers. Mr. <br />Bressler said the mall was not actively pursuing the placing of towers in the parking lot. <br />They do have safety and aesthetics concerns. <br />Paul Barker, 23629 Carriage Lane, said he had attended the Board of Zoning Appeals <br />meeting that the Law Director mentioned. Other areas were suggested to the developer, <br />but it was stated they were too far away from their grid. He agrees with Mr. Gareau that <br />the district should be expanded because down the line we are going to have problems. <br />Councilman Nashar said with the advancement of technology he believes the towers will <br />soon be replaced by something else such as a satellite dish. <br />Councilman McKay said, when he first heard about this, he was very opposed to anything <br />in the mall area because of safety and aesthetics. Although the towers are supposed to <br />collapse straight down, he is worried about a disaster. He believes a good place for the <br />towers where they would be safe is just east of the Hampton Inn. <br />Councilwoman Kasler suggested that the city consider hiring a consultant. The city <br />needs someone who can look into the matter of what actually happens in the industry and <br />whether or not companies can actually collocate on towers. This would be a help to our <br />boards and commissions as they are faced with these issues. <br />Councilman Miller said he agreed we need an expert because he also attended the Board <br />of Zoning Appeals meeting. There was a discussion of how many "erlangs" can go into a <br />pole simultaneously and the discussion got into very technical issues. The city had no <br />technical expert to refute what was being said. He did discuss the need for an expert with <br />the Law Director that evening and is glad that It'irs. Kasler has mentioned this issue. He <br />is pursuing that issue and is trying to locate someone that the city can use on a consuttant- <br />type basis. Councilman O'Grady suggested that this should be coordinated by the <br />Mayor's office. Councilman Miller said this would not be a position that the Mayor <br />Yvould be hiring as a member of the administrative staff. Rather it would be a consultant <br />to City Council. Council has a responsibility to vote knowledgeably; and, if we need an <br />expert in a given field for advice, that is what he is doing. If the Mayor wants his <br />2 <br />