My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/03/2002 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
12/03/2002 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:45:48 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 11:05:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
12/3/2002
Year
2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 12/3/2002 <br />Council-at-Large salaries for the four year term which begins in 2004. The <br />recommendation is that in 2004, there will be zero increase to the present amount <br />which is $11,104; 2005, zero increase; 2006, a 2% increase to $11,326; 2007, a 2% <br />increase to $11,553. The committee recommended approval. <br />Councilman Nashar noted that a letter to the editor in the Sunday Plain Dealer had <br />discussed the possibility of a state ban on the use of cell phones. There are two House <br />Bills, 280 and 281, being considered by the General Assembly He would like to see <br />those bills passed and plans on introducing a resolution in support of those bills. <br />Councilman Limpert: 1) The Recreation Commission met on December 2 at the <br />Recreation Center administration office. A quorum of the commission was present. The <br />city's administration will be conducting preliminary interviews for a new Recreation <br />Commissioner next week. A tentative date of December 19 has been scheduled for the <br />commission to meet with and interview the finalists of those preliminary interviews. <br />Councilwoman Kasler, chairperson of the Public Safety, Health & Welfare Committee: <br />1) The Safety Committee met this evening. Present were committee members, other <br />members of Council, Chris Allegra from the Youth Diversion Program, the Safety <br />Director and the Building Commissioner. The following items were discussed: <br />^ Ordinance 2002-171 which is an ordinance amending Section 555.03 of the General <br />Offenses Code in order to harmonize the treatment of and time for unloading trucks in <br />commercial zones. This was a continued discussion from a previous committee <br />meeting on the same subject, which was to make the time for loading and unloading 7 <br />o'clock and consistent with other similar codes and regulations in the city. After <br />discussion with the committee, Mr. Conway and the Law Director, it was decided that <br />7:30 a.m. would be a more reasonable time. Because of this change and because it <br />involved changing other codes and regulations in the city, the committee has <br />requested the Law Department to amend 2002-171 to reflect the 7:30 a.m. start time <br />for loading and unloading and to further amend and correct any related codes and <br />regulations within the city. The ordinance has been held in committee for those <br />changes. <br />^ Ordinance 2002-183 which is an ordinance amending Ordinance 98-140 as previously <br />amended by 2000-29 so as to increase the program fee for participants in the city's <br />community diversion program in order to address an anticipated decrease in funding <br />from the county for the city's program for the year 2003. Chris Allegra was present <br />to discuss this issue and has asked Council to raise the participant fees from $35 to <br />$70. The reasons for the increase are based on the following issues: There is an <br />anticipated reduction in the revenue to be received from the county for the <br />community diversion program because the monies are being spread over more cities. <br />North Olmsted will probably see a decrease from $12,000 to $9,900. North Olmsted <br />has the lowest participation fee in the county. The fees range from our $35 to over <br />$100. The average cost to us per case is $120, so the $70 new fee would not cover <br />the total cost to the city for the program. However, the program does sustain itself, <br />and the goal of the program is to keep the fund solvent and to use no General Fund <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.