My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/06/2002 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2002
>
08/06/2002 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:45:59 AM
Creation date
1/10/2014 11:05:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
8/6/2002
Year
2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 8/6/2002 <br />to fire a director. He cited examples of various cities who do not have this <br />requirement. The committee felt that this list was flawed in that it was incomplete <br />and did not reflect that some cities require Council approval of hiring persons for <br />these same positions. He asked the committee to look closely at putting this issue on <br />the ballot. Mr. Tom Jenkins, former Safety Director, was also in attendance. He <br />pointed out that the real issue to be considered is whether we want directors who can <br />be free to be public servants, or do we warn them to be political servants. He stated <br />strong objections to this ordinance and cited numerous reasons: This ordinance may <br />create figureheads responsible to make his or her political boss happy rather than <br />serve the city's best interest foremost. He suggested that, based on his experience, if <br />this issue were to pass, that all recruitment promises and in-office commitments <br />would have to be made in the form of a contract. Further, under this ordinance, the <br />directors or subordinates would become the fall-guys for the mayor's ineffectiveness <br />or poor leadership. Concerns were then brought up about the potemial for abuse of <br />power by an administration. Discussion then centered on the issue of conflicting <br />ordinances on the ballot at the same time. It was felt that the citizens are not well <br />served by such a scenario. After a lengthy discussion, the committee voted 2-0 to not <br />recommend passage of Ordinance 2002-100. <br />Ordinance 2002-104, an ordinance amending Chapter 177 of the City Administrative <br />Code entitled "Community Access" in order to establish non-public forums <br />permitting community organizations to access the City Hall website for the purpose <br />of positively promoting the welfare and development of North Olmsted and further to <br />allow access to two specific changeable copy signs owned and operated by the city <br />for the purpose of announcing community events and declaring an emergency. <br />Primarily discussed was the issue of whether or not fees should be charged to <br />organizations to help defray the city's costs incurred in erecting and removing the <br />overhead street banners. The Safety Director asked that she be given time to review <br />the issue and the Mayor asked, by letter, that the Law Director be given more time to <br />review this issue. Per those requests, the ordinance is being held in committee to be <br />rescheduled for further review. <br />Ordinance 2002-106, an ordinance providing for the submission to the electors of the <br />City of North Olmsted of an amendment to Article VII, Section 6 of the Charter of <br />the City of North Olmsted in order to establish the requirement that certain members <br />of the city Landmarks Commission meet specific professional qualifications and to <br />otherwise satisfy criteria for certification by the Ohio Historical Society and declaring <br />an emergency. This ordinance was requested by the Landmarks Commission and is <br />part of a process that was initiated in 1999. If completed, the city may become <br />eligible for federal grants to be used for historical preservation purposes. In <br />attendance also were Landmarks Commission members Joe Lang, Paul Barker and <br />Betty Lord. The committee recommended changes to Article VII, Section A to more <br />clearly define membership and conform to language from the Ohio Historical Society <br />and based on the federal code. Members of the Landmarks Commission who were <br />present concurred with the amendments. The committee recommended passage of <br />Ordinance 2002-106 in a 2-0 vote to include the aforesaid amendments. <br />A discussion of library azchitectural plans. The committee and the Landmarks <br />Commission members discussed the recommendations made by the Landmarks <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.