Laserfiche WebLink
Public Hearing of 11/18/2003 <br />dealing with the placement of cell towers. They began to pop up in different places. The <br />city had previously allowed one to go in on Claque Park on city property, and the city <br />generated revenue from it. Council decided to be proactive to allow certain azeas of <br />North Olmsted to be available for towers. It was limited to certain parts of the city <br />because we didn't want people putting up cell towers along Lorain Road in a commercial <br />district. At that time, we also said we would create an overlay district-small areas <br />within the city. One was the mall, another was the west end of city in the industrial area <br />along high tension towers. There were certain restrictions, but towers could be built in <br />those azeas. Until now, the campus of schools was not an area where towers would be <br />permitted. The question for this legislation is whether or not the overlay district would be <br />expanded and, therefore, a tower would be permitted to come into that particulaz location. <br />It would be subject to terms and conditions. Part of problem that residents are faced with <br />is this discussion is in a vacuum-like somebody hasn't presented aproposal--but they <br />have presented an idea. This zoning legislation only deals with concepts of allowing <br />towers. The proposed location of the tower would be on Middle School property, to the <br />far end of the football field on the right toward the grandstand. The plan is to replace a <br />light pole that is currently used for lighting the football field with a 120 foot tower. <br />There will be lights on the tower for the field, but this may throw less light off and direct <br />it more. The actual tower project will follow a process through the boazds and <br />commissions. <br />Mrs. Puinno asked why more power was needed in the city. <br />Dave Richazds, on behalf of Sprint Com, 6655 Pazkland Blvd., Solon, Ohio, addressed <br />the question regarding why they were in attendance at the public heazing and why they <br />aze looking for coverage in this area. Sprint has identified the azea centered where the <br />tower is proposed to be located as an azea where there is a gap in coverage and additional <br />coverage is needed for quality, reliable service for wireless network. Also in attendance <br />is a Sprint RF engineer, Steve Fannin, who has propagation maps that can show some of <br />the deficiencies in coverage in the area and what they aze attempting to cover by this site. <br />Councilman Limpert commented that residents should be awaze of history and why the <br />city has gone with overlays, etc. Council felt, if they did not put any sort of restrictions, <br />zoning, or whatever as to where towers could be located, you could have a situation <br />where a resident with a lazge enough backyazd could go put a tower in his yazd, reap the <br />profits, rent the house and buy another house someplace else and leave the neighbors to <br />look at the tower. tower. That is part of the logic why certain azeas were zoned to allow <br />the towers. By federal law, the city had to allow enough places azound the city for <br />towers. The thought was, if everyone has to look at it, everyone might as well reap some <br />of the benefit from it regazding the lease. Originally the city went with city property as <br />the main portion and then a few azeas were added in order to get locations to be diverse <br />enough according to federal law. Federal law does not allow the city to prohibit all cell <br />towers no matter what the reasoning or logic. One of the reasons we're strongly <br />considering this legislation is, as a city, we have somewhat monopolized the vast <br />majority of the proceeds to somewhat offset some of the tax burden of the citizens. <br />Citizens are also paying school taxes. This parcel of school property is a lazge parcel and <br />2 <br />