Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Minutes of 6/3/2003 <br />,,, safety of the citizens of North Olmsted. The First Amendment states: "Congess shall make <br />no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or <br />abridging freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people to peaceably assembly <br />and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Article X of the Charter of <br />North Olmsted, provides for recall. The corrtents of the First Amendment were so important <br />that they made it the First Amendment. So important that countless good and heroic persons <br />have fought horrific battles and given their lives to protect those freedoms for all Americans. <br />It is who we are. She has that right, and she takes that right extremely seriously. She will <br />not tolerate interference, nor will she back down or be intimated by Mr. Jesse or his <br />superiors. He may not like what she has to say, but he should defend and preserve her right <br />to do so. It is guaranteed by our Constitution. Mr. Miller asked exactly what Mr. DiSalvo <br />had asked her to do. Mr. Deis replied that he said her sign was not part of the landscaping <br />and that Mr. Jesse had instructed him to remove it immediately. With that comment, she <br />removed the sign from the soil. Mr. Miller asked if she had been asked to leave, and Mrs. <br />Deis said she had not but she felt it was an interference with her right to peaceably assembly. <br />Mr. Limpert directed his comments to the Law Director. He noted that freedom of speech as <br />far as what was meant by the founding fathers was for political speech. However, the city <br />does have ordinances as far as signs within the public right-of--way. Political speech would <br />also be an election sign, and we as a city remove signs that are out between the sidewalk and <br />the street because it is considered public property. Does this at all relate to each other? Law <br />Director Dubelko said he did not think it does. As this is the first he has heard of this <br />incident, he plans to talk with Mr. Jesse about it. He will provide him with appropriate <br />advice on respecting the First Amendment rights of citizens. <br />Amy Cornish, a former city employee. Ms. Cornish said she did not consider herself a <br />Republican or a Democrat. During her nearly nine year tenwe in North Olmsted, she worked <br />under both Republican and Democratic administrations. In the past, she has tried to stay out <br />of political battles. Just prior to the last mayoral election, she remembers receiving a flyer <br />from the Kasler campaign that made some accusations against the Musial administration. <br />Within days of that flyer being distributed to the general public, many files were deleted out <br />of a particular user directory. Personally, she does not know what was in those files. <br />However, she was asked by her immediate supervisor to verify who had access to this <br />specific directory. On the day of the last mayoral election, the Mayor sent out his own flyer <br />denying the allegations raised by his opponent. Despite the fact her job was on the line, what <br />she witnessed was enough for her to cast her vote for Mrs. Kasler. She sought out Marvin <br />Stotz to sign his petition after the Mayor sent out similar literature denying some of the <br />points made by members of the recall group. She is very disappointed at the direction this <br />Mayor is leading the community and has joined the recall goup in an effort to help resolve <br />this problem. While reviewing the past several months of Council minutes, she noticed an <br />abundance of employees attending the Council meetings expressing their concerns about the <br />fact the Mayor cut back staffing. Such cuts affected nearly every department in the City of <br />North Olmsted. As a result, the entire community suffered as streets went nearly unplowed <br />this past winter, children were forced to cross streets without a crossing guard, the Fire <br />Department was severely understaffed, etc. Employees were told that the cutbacks were due <br />to the state of our economy. At the December 17, 2002 Council meeting, a fire fighter <br />questioned why the amount of the deficit kept changing. The Mayor advised him the deficit <br />at that time was approximately $2.3 million. Roughly a month later, the Finance Director <br />reported a carryover balance from 2002 at $1.3 million. Within a few weeks time, the city <br />12 <br />~.u,~x ~, _ .. , ..,,~ ._.~.~, ... . <br />