My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/19/2004 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
10/19/2004 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:46:32 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 4:32:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
10/19/2004
Year
2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 10/19/2004 <br />,,,~: <br />highly recommends to Council and members of the administration the leadership training <br />sponsored by the Cleveland State Levine College of Urban Affairs. <br />Duane Limpert, 4921 Berkshire Drive, chairperson of the committee in support of the fire <br />levy. The levy (Issue 58) has been endorsed by the Sun Herald and will be endorsed by <br />the Westlife. The current Station No. 2 was built to house three firemen. We now have <br />five firefighters there and the potential for even more. Staffing is an issue because of <br />space. This is a step in the right direction. There is good news in that a .5 mill levy for <br />old sewer debt is coming off. The .4 mills for the proposed new fire station will actually <br />be a decrease of .1 mill. We can continue progress and not have to pay higher taxes than <br />we have been paying. <br />Don Pangrac, 23470 Sharon Drive, is all for a new fire station. However, there are no <br />drawings of what the station is going to look like and there aren't concrete numbers as to <br />what the fire station is going to cost. He is concerned about giving the city a blank check. <br />When the city plans projects, it needs to do a better job on homework and come to the <br />taxpayers and have some idea as to what this facility will look like. Councilman Limpert <br />answered that there has been a lot of homework done. There have been basic estimates <br />given on the cost for land acquisition and for the basic type of building based on <br />structures recently built in other communities. It would not be fiscally responsible to <br />spend $100,000 to $150,000 to get concrete, solid engineering estimates and architectural <br />work before it is approved by the voters. We do have solid estimates. The $4 million will <br />be enough to cover it. If we do not spend that much, there will be a pay down of the <br />bonds. There is a prime piece of property picked out that we think would be ideal. If <br />something were to change, we could move to a secondary property. The property will <br />affect the shape of the building. The Chief, Assistant Chief and Safety Director have <br />been involved in gathering the information. Safety Director Jesse came forward and said <br />he would send to Mr. Pangrac all available information, which includes a tentative floor <br />plan and budget numbers for various items. <br />Councilman Miller commented that he had twice asked the Mayor, once under public <br />records law, for records that the Mayor may or may not have for discussions he had <br />regarding acquisition of property with the client of his law firm. He has not received <br />those records and is concerned the Mayor may have worn at least two hats in approaching <br />the client of Musial &Musial law firm and also representing the city as the Mayor for a <br />proposed site of the new fire station. He asked the Law Director whether he could <br />represent Council in a lawsuit to demand those records. Law Director Dubelko said he <br />had some discussions in executive session about this some time ago. He did talk to the <br />Mayor and provided a memo to Council which outlined his discussions with the Mayor <br />regarding land acquisition, which was essentially nobody was promised anything. He <br />believes the administration has done due diligence in looking at the need for a new fire <br />station and what it would cost to construct a new fire station to serve the city's purposes <br />along with some related equipment. The next step is up to the voters. If the voters <br />approve it, there is going to be a long public process involving the designing of it and <br />approving it through the various boards and commissions and finally approving it through <br />City Council. Even the site itself is not a lock at this stage-there are probably any <br />12 <br />~. <br />„~;~ f. , <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.