Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 9/21/2004 <br />~~, Joe Kolar, 4598 Vernon Drive <br />~~,. Supports what Mr. Jacko said about parking on the island of the cul-de-sac. He has <br />lived there for 16 years, and people have parked in the cul-de-sac for years. This is <br />large and not the typical cul-de-sac. When the city changed the ordinance for parking <br />on the fire hydrant side of the street, the police were going to write tickets for parking <br />there. Councilman McKay came and looked at the area and felt the residents should <br />have a place to park since it was such a big area. The city posted signs and the <br />residents were allowed to park on the island side. The police did investigate and <br />agreed it was legal to park on that side. Suddenly, this past Sunday, the police issued <br />tickets. The letter from the Safety Director said the question of parking on the cul-de- <br />sac is undecided. Why were the tickets issued? The police refuse to answer that <br />question. Councilman Miller said he agreed that reasonableness is part of this issue. <br />His concern is whether emergency vehicles have access to the island if there are cars <br />parked. From the diagram, it seems that they should be able to have access with the <br />possible exception of the curve area. That will be the deciding factor as to what <br />should be done. Mr. Kolar commented that the residents have been reasonable about <br />the parking. They haven't parked on the circle part of the island. They have always <br />parked on the straight side so there's always been a way for a fire truck to get down. <br />They are not going to put themselves or their homes in jeopardy. <br />Charles Dial, 27959 Gardenia <br />^ Questioned Law Director Dubelko as to whether the Ohio Revised Code requires that <br />public records be archived in their original form. He is concerned about how Finance <br />Director Copfer is going to retain records. Finance Director Copfer said she planned <br />to take the issue to the records retention commission for guidance. Law Director said <br />two issues were presented: One is the obligation of the city to maintain records and <br />make them available to the public in whatever form they are being kept. Mrs. Copfer <br />correctly touched upon the need for retention schedules. Those are established by the <br />city's records commission, which is an on-going activity in our city headed by the <br />Safety Director that will establish permanent schedules to instruct as to when records <br />in different formats can be destroyed. <br />LEGISLATION <br />Ordinance No. 2004-b6 introduced by Councilman Gareau was given its third reading. <br />An ordinance amending Section 1161.05 of the city's Zoning Code in order to adjust <br />minimum parking standards for large unit commercial developments. Councilman <br />Gareau moved for adoption, and the motion was seconded by Councilman Limpert. Roll <br />call: Gareau, yes; Limpert, yes; Dailey, yes; Kasler, yes, with comment. It is her hope <br />that the Planning Director and other parties who are appropriate to this issue will mandate <br />and guarantee through future legislation that the property being preserved through this <br />reduction in parking space remain or be constructed to green. She is hoping that is a <br />follow-up to this ordinance. Roll call continued: McKay, no; Miller, no, with comment. <br />He could support this ordinance if it required atrade-off-the 20'~o change in parking to <br />become green space. However, it's folly to believe that developers buy commercially <br />priced property to plant grass on it. What will happen is we will have fewer parking <br />14 <br />