My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/28/2004 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
06/28/2004 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:46:37 AM
Creation date
1/13/2014 4:32:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
6/28/2004
Year
2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Special Council Minutes of 6/28/2004 <br />~~ azeas in the reaz. Building A is aone-story building on the east side of the site <br />with its main entrance facing west. Two entrance points to the site have been <br />proposed off of Brookpazk Road. The first is full motion at the traffic light across <br />from the Wal-Mart drive, and the second is farther east and is right-out only, <br />right-in only, and both are subject to approval by the State of Ohio. There is a <br />proposed atrium between Buildings C and D. The atrium will provide an upper <br />level connection between the two buildings and stairwell and elevators at both <br />levels. The ground level will remain open between the atrium and two buildings <br />for pedestrian traffic. There has been a great deal of concern expressed by the <br />residents regazding the impact of the buildings and associated activities on their <br />homes. The buildings were located in order to buffer, at a maximum permitted by <br />the use of the site, adjacent residents from the structures and to provide an <br />attractive landscape along Brookpazk Road. Planning Commission discussed in <br />some detail the location and orientation of buildings. Building A was located and <br />oriented on the site so that the building and loading/unloading activities would be <br />as faz as possible from residents. Locating that building in such a manner then <br />necessitated that other building elements would be arranged in a particular way. <br />Building A will have one entrance at its northwest corner. The entrance has been <br />located at this poim to ensure pedestrian safety from the east entrance point and to <br />spread out traffic through the parking field. An outdoor cart corral is located at <br />the northeast corner of the site, at a point least likely to have resident impact. <br />While residents expressed concern over the proximity of the entrance and cart <br />corral to their properties, there seem to be no better alternatives for the site for <br />either element on the site. The loading/unloading azea is located at the southeast <br />comer of the building in an enclosed dock. Buildings B, C and D have loading <br />azeas on the north sides of the structures that aze partially submerged into the <br />buildings. Carnegie Management verbally agreed to consolidate the various <br />parcels on the site and enter into a condominium agreement with Tazget rather <br />than split the lot. A consolidation plat is still owed to the City. <br />Land Use and Zoning <br />With respect to land use and zoning, the current proposal consists of a Target and <br />three mixed-use buildings. Buildings B, C and D will all have ground level retail. <br />Buildings B and C will have upper office. Building D will have a portion of <br />upper level community space. That upper level community space will be <br />managed by Carnegie Management and Development. The site is zoned Mixed <br />Use D, which is under Chapter 1149. This zoning classification requires that at <br />least two of the following principal uses are included: multiple dwellings, elderly <br />housing, cluster single family, office building, and/or local retail. There are <br />further requirements prohibiting more than 50 percent retail use of the gross floor <br />area and prohibiting any one building from exceeding ten percent of the buildable <br />azea. Earlier versions of the development plan met the land use mix requirement <br />with an above-retail residential component. A life-style center at that point <br />seemed to be in discussion. In short, because of the amount of retail proposed, the <br />site was becoming overbuilt in order to meet certain use requirements. Issues also <br />azose including impact on adjacent properties and difficulty in providing city <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.