My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/26/2004 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
05/26/2004 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2014 12:57:02 PM
Creation date
1/13/2014 4:55:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
5/26/2004
Year
2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VW will consolidate its dealerships from two to three: North Olmsted will be the west <br />side and Bedford will be the east. <br />Following discussion, the Committee unanimously recommended approval of <br />2004-39. It was not reported out of committee as required by local rule of council. <br />On April 21, 2004 the Committee again took up the rezoning ordinance. <br />Numerous residents from Ranchview, West Ranchview, and Timber Cove were present. <br />Mr. Jordan Berns was present as was Planner Bob Hill. The discussion concerning the <br />rezoning centered upon the feasibility of the split lot zone concept. Mr. Hill explained <br />that split zoning as a means of buffering from adjacent residential properties, although <br />once common, no longer served its purpose. He believed it to be an arbitrary and <br />unenforceable zoning classification. Councilman Miller pointed out that Mr. Hill did not <br />know the history of the zoning ordinance and without such knowledge could not reach <br />such a conclusion about the arbitrariness of the ordinance. <br />Resident concerns were many and included: loss of trees, buffering of residential <br />property; decreasing property values, noise, lighting, traffic and a general encroachment <br />into residential property. ~ <br />Mr. Dubelko offered his opinion on the split lot zoning and included a summary <br />of Ohio law on the constitutionality of split lot zoning. Included was a summary of the <br />City's burden in defending its zoning ordinances and that Ohio law now allows for <br />damages to be awarded to a developer if the zoning ordinance is ruled invalid. He noted <br />that while the playing field for years was slanted in favor of the municipality (whereby <br />when a zoning ordinance was invalidated, the City merely changed the zoning) that <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.