Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 12/6/2005 <br />during the year we were challenged with pool emergencies, equipment <br />emergencies and some rather unexpected and expensive breakdowns. Priorities <br />have to be fluid in a facility such as the Recreation Center. It is anticipated the <br />master plan will be done the end of 2006. <br />• Update on the CDBG program. <br />• Discussion about very loud ballasts in the tennis area. Lights that are. about to <br />burn out tend to make a loud humming or ringing sound. There are 72 lights in <br />the tennis area, and 4 are causing an annoying, continual noise. The replacement <br />of the ballasts is approximately $300. Our own staff can replace them; however, <br />the Recreation budget has been spent down and they cannot afford the $300 <br />before the first of the year. We should probably purchase 6 as they continually <br />need to be replaced. <br />Councilman Gareau noted, regarding master plan review for Recreation facilities, that <br />this depends on Council being able to fund this multi-phase project. If Council cannot <br />fund Phase II, it will not be completed by the end of 2006. Councilman Miller asked for <br />clarification from Planning Director Wenger as he believed Phase I was the first year. <br />Ms. Wenger said the $10,000 is for the first phase which should last about six months. <br />Councilman Miller said there is a plan being assembled right now to address the funding <br />and to preserve those funds for that purpose. Hopefully, we will isolate those funds if <br />they become available and protect those funds so that we can get this master plan under <br />way. Some projects are being held up so that the master plan can be completed. The <br />consensus and agreement was, when this was first discussed with Ms. Wenger, that the <br />master plan could address numerous issues and put together the prioritization list that <br />everyone wants to see. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />Dale Markiewicz, office address, 100 Seventh Avenue, Chardon, Ohio, spoke on behalf <br />of his client Barton JKU which owns a 4-acre piece of property on Barton Road which <br />has athree-tier zoning. It is zoned Single Family Residential, Multi-Family Residential <br />in the middle, and the rear is zoned Industrial. The majority of 3.2 acres, is zoned Multi- <br />Family. They have been working on a plan for use of the property for a senior residence <br />facility. He believes Council's change to a minimum 8 acre requirement for senior <br />residences is too high. They suggest 3.2 acres. They believe very strongly that by <br />requiring a minimum of 8 acres for a senior project, the city will deny access and will <br />deny people most in need and will commercialize, which is exactly what the city does not <br />want to do. It will compel developers to come in with more units, with more amenities, <br />more impacts on the neighborhood. His research on the industry indicates that projects <br />usually have 80 to 110 units. They propose a substantial reduction in the acreage so that <br />the people in the community have achoice-to be able to go into a facility that is not as <br />large. People are reticent to go into a large facility because they lose that sense of home. <br />He asked Council to reconsider the minimum of 8 acres and to think about the inventory <br />of land in the community. There will be approximately 2,000 people in the community in <br />about five years who are going to need this kind of housing. <br />12 <br /> <br />