Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 6-7-2005 <br />at the site called for drinking fountains to be included along the path of the four-inch <br />pipe that was put in for the purpose of watering the fields. The pipe has never been <br />used for that purpose, and Brad Friedel went elsewhere with his program. The <br />important thing to note is that it is a four-inch pipe. The unfortunate thing for <br />drinking fountains is that afour-inch pipe is far too large of a capacity for that <br />purpose. It is meant to provide sufficient water at sufficient pressure to water lawns. <br />When water sits in that pipe, as it has for months, it will be become stagnant. Also, it <br />is interacted upon by the chemicals that are used for the lawn fertilizer, etc. <br />Therefore, that water should not be used for drinking purposes. Since we do have the <br />two drinking fountains, the Service Director is going to look at the current hook-ups <br />of the water main coming in near the restroom facilities which would be the correct <br />size pipe to support drinking fountains. It is hoped that these can be working before <br />the NOSO Cup, but by no means is that definite. <br />Councilman Barker asked the Mayor if service on the west end of town was discussed <br />during his meeting with CEI. The west end of the city is experiencing frequent power <br />outages, and he does not believe the company has been as responsive as in the past. <br />Mayor O'Grady said a number of issues were discussed-the need for CEI to accelerate <br />the plan for their review of where trees are interacting improperly with power lines and <br />causing outages and brownouts. He has been pleased to see their crews have been out <br />and about in the city. They are addressing an issue they know is a concern to us. During <br />a recent major storm, CEI was responsive when the city called upon them to restore <br />power to the west end of the city where numerous residents rely on sump pumps in order <br />to keep the water away from their homes. This would have caused a sigtuficant financial <br />impact upon the residents, but CEI had power restored sooner than they promised. <br />Law Director Dubelko: 1) Prosecutor's report: In the month of May, the Prosecutor <br />handled 231 cases, about 75% were traffic cases. Only one case actually went to trial and <br />it resulted in a conviction. <br />2) At the special meeting of May 23, Council authorized the Director of Law to file <br />motions to vacate two arbitration awards that came back in the fire fighter union's favor. <br />The first of those motions was filed on May 26. We have received a response from the <br />union. What happens typically in these type of cases, the party who didn't prevail files a <br />motion to vacate it. They believe strongly that an error was done. The apposing party <br />attempts to confirm the award by filing a motion to confirm. The union has filed a <br />motion to confirm. A hearing has been set before Jude Sutula for tomorrow morning. <br />3) Along with other members of the administration, he attended two meetings with <br />AFSCME representatives to discuss and reach agreement on incorporating certain part- <br />time employees into the AFSCME Clerical-Tech bargaining unit. <br />4) Attended alabor-management committee meeting with the city's fire fighters. <br />Although the parties maybe in court battling on the very difficult arbitration awards, they <br />are sitting down together and to try to find a way to go forward and improve labor- <br />management relations. From his part and from everyone on the administration's side, <br />they are going to continue that process to try to improve relations. <br />5) On May 24 and today, he provided a-mail advice to the Mayor, directors and members <br />® of Council on the new U. S. Supreme Court decision in Chevron vs. Lingle. It's a very <br />5 <br />