My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/19/2005 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
04/19/2005 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:49:41 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 9:11:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
4/19/2005
Year
2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Council Minutes of 4/19/2005 <br />Don Pangrac, 23470 Sharon Drive, asked if the city was borrowing $6.5 million. Finance <br />Director said it was $3.3 million of new money. Mr. Pangrac asked what the interest rate <br />would be, how long would the borrowing be for, what is the total cost to the city for the <br />borrowing, what has to be done to get us out of the borrow-spend payback cycle. Finance <br />Director said we just sold our renewal notes that we paid down. We had 3.03% on most <br />of the notes and 3.23% on one series. That is the short-term rate. It is a one-year term, <br />they are bond anticipation notes. She has been attempting to pay down an amount equal <br />to the average useful life of that series of notes so that the principal amount is getting <br />reduced every year. When they go out to bonds, we will know the true cost because long- <br />term rates are different than short-term rates. It depends on the timing of the market. <br />Right now, the long-term rates are relatively good, but the short-term rates are rising <br />quickly. To get out of the borrow-spend cycle, we need additional revenue sources to <br />help earmark monies for streets and capital improvements. Some municipalities years <br />ago wisely started capital improvement replacement funds. For example, when they <br />bought a fire truck, they decided what the cost was going to be in 10 years for <br />replacement, and they funded the depreciation every year and put monies into the funds. <br />In that way, the money is there years down the road when the new fire truck is needed. <br />With streets, we get monies on the gas tax, etc. A portion of that does go for street repair <br />material and some of it pays for the wages for road maintenance. If we could get those <br />funds back into the General Fund, then we would have over a million dollars a year to <br />pay for streets. The permanent improvements street and storm levy, which is 15% of the <br />municipal income tax, was earmarked to pay for street and storm improvements. <br />However, all of that was pledged in 1996. All of the monies going into it, until maybe a <br />year and a half ago, barely covered, and some year didn't cover, the amount of debt for <br />the payment of principal and interest on those. Finally, the income tax is growing enough <br />that there is a little more in there that could start to be utilized to do street repair programs <br />rather than borrowing. It is probably on a hundred thousand dollars a year. There are a <br />lot of projects with the county far next year, and we are looking at those funds to help us <br />pay our contribution rather than borrowing. Mr. Pangrac asked how much the city is <br />paying in interest on the borrowing we have. Mrs. Copfer said she did have the exact <br />number in front of her, but it is a very sizable portion. Mr. Pangrac said, if we didn't have <br />the borrowing, we could have all the money we are paying out in interest we could use <br />for capital projects. He makes a recommendation that the city take that money and put it <br />away and not use it and let the interest on it help pay the interest on the borrowing we <br />have to get out of this borrow-spend payback cycle. Councilman Gareau said Council <br />has talked about changing the way we do streets. We have tried to do concrete in three <br />different ways. A lot of the debt has to do with street repair. The slab repair program <br />was not as successful as we had hoped. But if we do not borrow to fix the streets, they <br />only get worse. These borrowings were done a long time ago. The cost of government <br />goes up every year. The money from the sale of the library is in a fund earmarked for <br />future capital improvement that type of thinking is out there. The options of raising <br />taxes, assessing residents to fix streets or adjusting the tax credit are not options that <br />anybody would be in favor of. So the city has had to borrow funds. Mr. Pangrac said <br />Ohio is one of the top five taxed states and it makes it unappealing to live in this state. <br />Mayor O'Grady said Mr. Pangrac's comments are well taken. If we could get rid of that <br />debt, we could take the money we are paying on the debt and apply into the roads and <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.