Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 3/15/24Q5 <br />Calabrese did not think a study was necessary. Mr. Bouman believes there will be regrets <br />later. He is very sorry we are losing the bus line as an asset. <br />Don Pangrac, 23470 Sharon Drive. Publicly asked Mr. Calabrese (who was in the <br />audience), in light of the amount of savings he says he is going to achieve, that he <br />provide the City of North Olmsted, Mayor and Council, of a financial statement of what <br />is now NOMBL on a quarterly basis comparing his actual expenditures to the projected <br />savings that he says he's going to achieve. This will be used as a monitoring tool to <br />support his contention that there is going to be the $1.8 million savings. At some point in <br />the course of time, these numbers should be compared to audited numbers. <br />Thomas Ryan, 26734 Sudbury Drive. Thanked everyone for their efforts in the NOMBL <br />issue overall. Occurred to him that every good faith effort to continue the partnership <br />between NOMBL and GCRTA has failed, and wondered if it is time to contemplate <br />creating our own regional transit authority. According to ORC, Title III, Chapter 306, <br />Section 32, states that "...any county, municipal corporation, township or any <br />combination thereof, may create a regional transit authority by the adoption o£ .." <br />Creation of this would allow North Olmsted to keep all of our jobs, bus services and the <br />1 % sales tax that is currently going to the county. Is this possible? <br />Law Director Dubelko said there is a regional transit authority in Cuyahoga County. It's <br />an interesting question, but he does not believe a second regional transit authority can be <br />formed within the same jurisdiction of an existing regional transit authority. Even if you <br />could, the present 1 % sales tax revenues are going to the existing authority, so you have <br />to defund it. The voters would have to eliminate that tax or create a new one. It is an <br />interesting legal question, but he thinks it would have a lot of legal hurdles. <br />Mr. Ryan said he had done some research and feels that, if a new transit authority is <br />created, the current transit authority sales tax would then be appropriated to the new <br />transit authority under certain circumstances. Councilman Dailey asked what those <br />circumstances might be. Mr. Ryan said there is a provision that no regional transit <br />authority shall be organized, however, unless the current transit authority fails for its <br />purposes, including the purpose for which such existing regional transit authority was <br />originally created. North Olmsted could make a good faith argument that GCRTA fails <br />in its original purposes to serve the community of North Olmsted. We could then argue <br />that we should be able to leave the GCRTA and create our own transit authority. <br />Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, liked Mr. Ryan's idea and said he had previously <br />raised that possibility. He believes this is not an issue of the bus service, but it is an issue <br />of regional government. What everyone is discussing are symptoms. The real problem is <br />regional government. Regional government entities such as RTA and the Regional <br />Sewer District are "in the business of doing business." Everybody wants to dig into the <br />citizens' pockets for the scam called regional government. He will be reminding <br />everybody of what regional government can do without the voters authority to give it or <br />take it away long after Mr. Calabrese is gone. He is happy for the bus drivers who will <br />be kept employed. But he feels the need to continue to remind everyone that the issue is <br />14 <br />