Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 2/1/2005 <br />the south side and the appearance this would give the building when traveling down <br />Brookpark Road. Whereas once there was an area of grass, now there would be grass and <br />parking. There were some aesthetic considerations as well with the view from the south side <br />and what impact the parking would have. Again, it was a green space issue. The Planner <br />commented that the line of travel proposed for the parking area was hazardous and it was <br />suggested that vehicles would have to back up in order to properly use the traffic pattern that <br />was proposed. Everybody agreed. that was not a good idea. Mr. McKay suggested that by <br />moving the buildings back they become more equal with the second story of most of the <br />homes and that would be intrusive to the residential properties. The committee expressed an <br />opinion, along with most of the members of Council, that the proposed changes were not <br />acceptable. The plan originally presented to Council for Parcel E contemplated an <br />aesthetically pleasing environment-almost a lifestyle center. This pro~sal is believed to be <br />the latest attempt to deviate from that and to bring the project away from what was once a <br />charming and attractive project to simply nothing more than a strip center. City Council <br />expressed its opinion when they said they did not believe it was an appropriate change. <br />Because it was an informal proposal, there was no vote taken. <br />• Review of Resolution 2005-9, a resolution authorizing the Mayor to enter a project labor <br />agreement with the Cleveland Building and Construction Trades Council in connection with <br />the construction of new fire station No. 2 and declaring an emergency. Terrence Joyce was <br />present on the behalf of labor. He is with the Laborers International Union of North <br />America, Loca1310 and is also affiliated with the Construction Trades Council as its current <br />president. During the discussion almut the merits of the PLA, Mr. Joyce represented that his <br />organization is more than happy to have discussion with the city. He said this was not so <br />much an issue about labor peace and insuring there is no walkout, but did say there were a <br />number of agreements set to expire and this would avoid potential work stoppages. He <br />emphasized the fact this is a safe workplace-they have enacted standards to ensure those <br />workers on the site not only comply with safety standards, but also are drug and alcohol free, <br />which he felt was an important issue. The Mayor had oat yet taken a position on this and had <br />not entered into discussions with the Council concerning a PLA. The committee <br />unanimously voted to recommend approval of the resolution. <br />• Ordinance 2004-200, an ordinance amending Sections 1115.02 and 1139.06 of the city's <br />Zoning Code in order to better define and distinguish different categories of restaurants for <br />Zoning Code purposes and to exclude small sandwich shops from the 1.5 acre minimum lot <br />size requirement of the General Retail Business District regulations. The legislation will be <br />held in committee until a public hearing is held. He will report on this in more detail at a <br />future time. <br />• Ordinance 2005-11, an ordinance amending Sections 1363.08 and 1363.10 of Chapter 1363 <br />of the Real Property Maintenance Code by removing the administrative appeal and variance <br />procedures contained therein and otherwise streamlining the violation and notice procedures <br />contained therein in order to provide for more effective real property maintenance code <br />enforcement in the City of North Olmsted and declaring an emergency. This was a fairly <br />comprehensive rewrite of the notice provisions of our real property maintenance code. <br />Generally speaking, the opinion of the committee was that the recommendations were good. <br />However, it was brought to the committee's attention that by removing these sections we may <br />have created a conflict with our Charter which needs to be addressed. After that matter was <br />brought forward by Mr. Burns, it was referred back to the Law Department for review as to <br />whether to continue forward with this ordinance or introduce a new ordinance to make <br />7 <br />