Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 1/18/2005 <br />for replacement Fire Station No. 2 and declaring an emergency. The Law Director <br />pointed out to the committee that he is not authorized to proceed with negotiations <br />with the property owners until appraisals have first been completed. Since the <br />decision to proceed with appraisals was just made, it was the recommendation of the <br />joint Public Safety and BZD Committees that the legislation be held in committee. <br />• Law Director Dubelko inquired whether the motion to amend Ordinance 2004-80 <br />included the various other changes discussed and recommended by committee in <br />addition to those for Section 13b3.07 (a) (7). Councilman Gareau said it had not, and <br />he made a motion to amend Ordinance 2004-80 consistent with the modifications as <br />written in the document. The motion was seconded by Councilman McKay and <br />passed unanimously. Ordinance No. 2004-80 amended for a second time. <br />Councilman Miller requested that the issue of newspaper and advertising boxes be taken <br />into committee. For example, he explained there are numerous boxes at the intersection <br />of Sparky Lane and Lorain Road. A number of these are clearly not news publications, <br />but are commercial ventures. Some of the boxes are in the right-of--way, and they are an <br />eyesore. Councilman Gareau, chairperson of the BZD Committee, agreed to take the <br />issue into committee for discussion. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, commented that our city and others are endeavoring <br />to make services more efficient and basically tightening their belts. However, in the case <br />of regional transit, he believes things seem to be growing. Over a period of years, RTA <br />has gotten into other service areas such as snowplowing and even law enforcement. <br />These are all services that could be provided by private firms or the individual <br />municipalities at a lower cost. RTA is now coming back to our community and telling <br />us they don't have the money for NOMBL, that they need to cut back, they need to <br />tighten their belt. But they don't need to tighten their belt when they start shifting those <br />extraordinary expenses to the city to bear their brunt of the cutbacks. This is something <br />that really needs to be looked at. Somebody needs to get into the books at RTA and see <br />what they are spending versus what their ridership has been. Another area of <br />extravagance is the use of large buses in off-peak hours when much smaller vehicles <br />could be used. These extravagant expenses are being shifted onto the burden of this <br />community when they ask us to forego our contract to "save them money" so they can <br />continue to spend on extravagances. They need to drive buses and nothing else. <br />Finance Director Copfer said that the negotiating committee, at the first meeting, <br />requested detailed information. RTA's CAFR is more like a corporate annual report, <br />very glossy, very high-level information. It doesn't even break it down by what type of <br />transit. The team requested more detailed information but has not yet received it. Law <br />Director Dubelko noted that Congressman Kucinich has made a public records demand <br />and has acquired records and is communicating with RTA based on the records he has <br />acquired. <br /> <br />8 <br />