Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 6/6/2006 <br />whatever it takes to solve this problem. Mayor O'Grady spoke on behalf of the members <br />of Council who voted in favor of allowing this use as they did so based upon the facts <br />that were presented to them and with the exact same use occurring in another <br />neighborhood without problem. Once Council does their job, the responsibility comes <br />over to him and his administration. The most important mission in his administration is <br />to protect residents. The residents' quality of life is being impacted. The Safety Dept. is <br />aware of the problem and it is being investigated through the Building Dept. The <br />legislation that is coming forward today will give the administration the tools to start <br />getting something done. He will take action. Councilman Miller suggested the business <br />refrain from using the equipment during smog alert days. Perhaps this is an EPA issue <br />and we can get that organization involved. Councilman Orlowski said an activist groups <br />had monitored the recycling of chemicals at a plant in the Cleveland Flats. He suggested <br />that company could be looked into to see what process was used and what corrective <br />measures were taken. Councilman Tallon echoed Mr. Kennedy's earlier comments and <br />said he too would respond within a few minutes if the residents would call him when they <br />detect a problem. <br />Byron Vine, 26601 Leenders Lane, also spoke on the Suburban issue. He is a former <br />safety director of a company and said that this is anout-of-control process. Also, it is a <br />health hazard due to same of the materials being used and there is also the potential for <br />an explosion hazard. These issues were talked about in the past, but he wants to reiterate <br />that this is not just a nuisance but a potential for health and safety hazazds. This is an out- <br />of-control process and it's likely that somebody is going to get hurt. <br />Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, said he felt the. city needed an engineer. A city <br />engineer would have help~l in looking at the Suburban situation in the first place and <br />would be able to help analyze what is causing the problems now. He agrees that this is a <br />health hazard. Regarding city streets, he has a concern about Country Club Blvd. which <br />he feels needs attention. He believes the problems are coming from underneath the street <br />where the slabs get disjointed and start "floating." County Club Blvd. and Great <br />Northern Blvd. are the main streets that visitors and business interests see when they <br />come into this community. They stay in those motels; they visit those office buildings. <br />And they come in off of Great Northern Blvd. to get there and go. All the wishes in the <br />world to do good things for this city aze not going to happen unless you have business <br />people who want to come here, want to bring their business here, want to locate here and <br />pay taxes here. So those streets are vitally important. A city engineer should have been <br />on the bus when Council took the street tour to give recommendations. An engineer will <br />be needed to corroborate the information that will be coming from the outside company <br />that will evaluate the city streets. Professionals were brought in with the Suburban <br />proposal, and they concluded there wouldn't be a problem, but there is. A city engineer <br />would have been useful in that situation. <br />Mayor O'Grady said he felt Mr. Lambert's comments with regard to an engineer were <br />without merit. What we have here is a situation where assurances were made, and his <br />administration intends to make certain that those assurances aze carried out. The <br />discussion on the engineer is totally separate from this. He will continue to make change <br />11 <br />