My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/07/2007 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2007
>
08/07/2007 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:14 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 10:09:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
8/7/2007
Year
2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 8/7/2007 <br />Council of Chapter 1126 and that the BZD Committee had no ability to review variances. <br />He reminded Council and its committee that it is to review those findings of adverse <br />impact of the Planning & Design Commission of which there were none. Mr. Tallon <br />remarked that he had several concerns with the proposal including that the building did <br />not look residential in character since this was a residential neighborhood. He did not <br />like the look of the clock and referred to as a "turret." He felt it looked like a commercial <br />building in a residential neighborhood. He also objected to the retention basin and <br />thought it should be somewhere else near the rear of the property and away from the sight <br />line of traffic. He felt it could be moved and pumped to the street. He indicated simply <br />because that was more expensive wasn't necessarily a concern for Council. Mr. Lynn, <br />23560 Mastick Road, spoke against the project and he also felt it should not be <br />developed. He felt residential should be residential. Mr. Jerry Barrett spoke in favor of <br />the project and reminded Council of Dr. Walters contributions to the community over the <br />years. A gentleman from the Chamber of Commerce rose in favor of the project and <br />spoke on behalf of Dr. Walters and urged approval. Glenn Vannoy a 46-year resident of <br />Clague Road spoke of his concerns with above-ground retention. He thought the clock <br />tower should be removed. He also was upset about the notice for the meeting. Mr. <br />Gareau explained there is no notice requirement for the BZD Committee meetings. But <br />we try to do our best to let people know. We have our usual standard postings and cable <br />channels and web pages, but no individual letters were mailed out. Mr. Miller spoke of <br />reserving the green space on the site. He took exception to the church, cell tower and <br />ODOT lots in the general neighborhood being used as points of reference to justify this <br />project. He also felt the project didn't look residential for a residential neighborhood. He <br />did express his general concern about commercial encroachment into residential, but he <br />did make clear that he was not going to second-guess BZA. Mrs. Sheila Barrett also <br />spoke in support of the project. After a recess, the committee stood adjourned until 7:57. <br />At 7:57, the committee, after an intervening Finance Committee meeting, resumed. <br />Councilman Gareau at that point moved to hold the matter in committee. The motion <br />was seconded by Councilman Miller and unanimously passed. <br />2) The Building, Zoning & Development Committee met again on August 7, 2007 at 6:15 <br />p.m. Agenda items included: <br />• Key Bank at 26380 Great Northern Shopping Center. The Key Bank proposal <br />was addressed by Planning Director Wenger. The proposal consists of exterior <br />building and site renovations consistent with the Key corporate image and their <br />system-wide revitalization. Additions will include a canopy and adding a stucco <br />area above the current windows, extending the drive-through awning, new <br />building lighting and new signage. The Planning & Design Commission required <br />rooftop units would not be visible from the street. The best part of this project are <br />site improvements as there currently is not much in the area in the way of <br />landscaping. They intend to install quite a bit of new landscaping around the <br />building and the parking lot, particularly the islands, which will make a great <br />addition. They are also going to be doing landscaping irrigation to all the <br />improved areas to keep it green. They will clean it up and add some lane and <br />parking striping for better circulation and definition. It should be noted that all <br />Planning & Design Commission requirements are noted on the current plan <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.