Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 6/5/2007 <br />was upheld with four yes votes, two no votes and one abstention. Mr. Limpert did not <br />speak, and the meeting continued. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />1) Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, said the figures given by Mr. Ryan were <br />interesting. He noted, when the entire power grid was out on the east coast of this <br />country including Cleveland and Canada, most of Cleveland had no water except North <br />Olmsted because of that water tower. So that stands as a very significant thing that <br />should be looked at-it is a serious issue. Mr. Lambert spoke about the legislation which <br />would require the city seal to be placed on city vehicles. He dismissed the idea that the <br />city could not afford to do so and noted that the signs indicating who the Mayor is were <br />changed quite rapidly when Mayor O'Grady took office. He feels the administration has <br />to act responsibly and, if they don't, then it is the obligation of Council to be responsible. <br />There's nothing wrong with identifying the city cars unless you have something to hide, <br />unless there's something you don't want the citizens to see. There's no other reason for <br />not passing that legislation. Mayor O'Grady commented that Mr. Lambert's accusation <br />is not based on facts. The administration is not choosing to be deceptive, to hide or stop <br />debate. His administration is open and honest. Councilman Tallon said the Council did <br />not stop debate on an issue. Mr. Ryan has asked to form a committee at which time Mr. <br />Limpert or anyone will be more than welcome to speak. Councilman Ryan agreed and <br />said his purpose was to direct the discussion to a forum where there could be a long <br />discussion and then bring the information back to Council. Mr. Limpert came forward <br />and noted that the quick placement of the Mayor's signs were the work of the Service <br />Department and the directive did not come from the Mayor's office. <br />2) Patricia Zeto, 5753 Elmhurst Road, spoke about the proposed cell tower on the fire <br />station site. She is concerned about possible health issues as her son is recovering from a <br />kidney condition. There are many young families in this neighborhood, and she feels the <br />cell tower would be too close to a residential area. <br />3) Terry Groden, 25211 Chase Drive, spoke on the issue of serving alcohol in North <br />Olmsted Park. He doesn't think it's a good idea for the city to condone or support any <br />opportunity for children to be exposed to alcohol consumption on city property whether <br />it's served responsibly or not. The more people see of a product, and the more o8en they <br />see it, increases the likelihood that they will sample that product. There's nothing the <br />city can do about alcohol legally served in homes, bars, restaurants and private <br />properties; but he thinks the city should not provide another venue for minors to be <br />exposed to a drug they are not ready to make an adult decision about. He read comments <br />from Westlake Mayor Clough regarding underage drinking which noted that alcohol is <br />the drug of choice for those under 21, and is far too easily obtained by young, creative <br />minds. Teens and adults under 21 account for 75% of all traffic fatalities. Of those <br />deaths, half are alcohol related. Alcohol also reduces inhibitions, resulting in suicides of <br />already depressed teens, sexual activity, deaths from binge drinking and a host of other <br />social ills. In light of all this information, he does not believe allowing alcohol to be <br />served in a city park where minors are present and children come to play is a responsible <br />12 <br />