Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 3/20/2007 <br /> <br />President Kennedy; Service Director Limpert and Law Director Dubelko. Agenda items <br />included the following: <br />• Resolution 2007-22, a resolution authorizing the Director of Fublic Service to <br />advertise for bids for crack sealing on various streets in the City of North <br />Olmsted, as per specifications on file in his office, and authorizing the Mayor to <br />enter into a contract for the same. The Service Director explained that in 2005 <br />some crack sealing was contracted out, but it was more cost-effective for the City <br />to do this in-house. This year the administration is going to go out for bid for the <br />large areas of streets that need to be crack sealed, such as Brookpark and Lorain <br />roads. By doing this, it will help to free up some of our Service Department <br />workers to crack seal our residential neighborhoods and to do other street <br />maintenance in those areas such as road preparation and street pavement marking. <br />Council asked if the crack sealer that was purchased a few years ago was still <br />going to be used, and the Service Director said the machine would be used on the <br />residential streets that need to be sealed. Council also asked questions about who <br />would inspect the work and how many companies do this type of work. The <br />committee voted 3-0 to recommend approval of the legislation. <br />• Ordinance 2007-27, an ordinance establishing new regulations relating to the <br />removal and deposit of snow and ice on sidewalks, tree lawn areas, and driveway <br />aprons in the City of North Olmsted; creating new section 765.02 of the Business <br />Regulation Code; amending sections 521.06 and 521.11 of the General Offenses <br />Code; and declaring an emergency. Mrs. Jones explained some of the history of <br />how this ordinance came to be proposed. The Law Director said that there was an <br />Ohio Supreme Court decision years ago which imposed the liability of someone <br />falling on a sidewalk that was cleared to the property owner, and at the same time <br />there have been local codes which said that there was an obligation of the <br />property owner to remove the snow and ice accumulation from the sidewalks. A <br />few years ago, this question was asked and the city took the position of not citing <br />people in residential areas for failing to remove snow and ice because it created an <br />unfair situation for those property owners. However, the city was still dealing <br />with the issue of businesses clearing out parking lots and dumping the snow onto <br />sidewalks which then made them impassable. What is being proposed in this <br />ordinance is to eliminate the duty of enforcement of this issue of the city in <br />residential areas and to create a new business regulation which would allow the <br />city to enforce the regulation in commercial areas. At this time, the Service <br />Department has been clearing the sidewalks on main roads. The Law Director <br />does not believe that this new section of the code would bring hardship to <br />business owners because businesses should have a heightened sense of <br />responsibility to remove the snow and ice accumulation on their sidewalks in <br />order for pedestrians to walk easily and not be forced to walk into the street. In <br />addition, the Law Director said that businesses have insurance to cover incidents <br />such as a fall, and the majority of homeowners do not have that type of insurance <br />coverage. Questions were asked about how to enforce this regulation, how other <br />cities regulate this issue, and how much time is spent by the Service Department <br />in clearing out businesses' sidewalks after a snow event. The Chamber of <br />9 <br />,~ _ <br />