Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 3/6/2007 <br />residential for commercial use. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas agreed with the city and <br />entered judgment for the city. Halleen took an appeal to the Court of Appeals on this issue. <br />• City of North Olmsted v. IAFF Local 1267 -Appeal (motion to vacate) from award of <br />arbitrator Carrie Donald in favor of the union on the issue of whether aside-agreement <br />between former Chief Bak and the union, surrendering management's right to determine <br />how many fire fighters may be off on a given day, draws its essence from the parties' <br />collective bazgaining agreement. Reply briefs on the merits of the case were recently filed <br />by both parties. There is also a procedural skirmish occurring. Although it's a statutory <br />proceeding calling for motions to vacate and/or confirm, the union has filed a motion for <br />default judgment contending that the city should have filed an "Answer" to its motion <br />(styled as a counterclaim) to confirm. The city has responded by filing a motion to strike <br />the motion for default judgment. The court is in the process of scheduling hearing dates for <br />these motions. <br />• IAFF Local 1267 grievance arbitration on the issue of the meaning of "hours worked." <br />The city received an adverse arbitration award last week from arbitrator Ruben in this <br />grievance arbitration, which raised the issue of whether "hours worked" in the collective <br />bargaining agreement meant "hours actually worked." The contract indicates that fire <br />fighters qualify for overtime when they have worked more than 24 hours in a 72 hour <br />period. The arbitrator wrote a 52 page opinion, which explored a number of legal theories, <br />and concluded that the word "worked" as used in the fire fighter contract doesn't mean <br />"actually worked," because the city for the last twenty years has paid fire fighters overtime <br />whenever they were called in on a day off-regardless of whether they had worked 24 <br />hours in the last 72. He is presently consulting with the Mayor whether this award should <br />be appealed, keeping in mind that awards should not be appealed if it may reasonably be <br />said that they draw their essence from the collective bazgaining agreement. <br />Councilman Gareau asked if the affect of that awazd is that paid time off is not included in <br />the calculation of overtime. Law Director Dubelko said the city will continue to do <br />business the same way it has done for a number of years. <br />Finance Director Copfer: 1) She has been participating in the budget hearings and helping <br />obtain the information from the administration in response to Council's request for follow- <br />up information. <br />2) She was concerned after reading the Feb 16, 2007 Ohio Municipal League bulletin on <br />estate tax elimination. They are preparing to fight to protect our local government fund <br />from being further reduced or stagnant. We must protect what revenue streams we have <br />that fund the General Fund or we will be forced to make even tougher choices. <br />3) She made a "Finance 101" presentation to the Recreation Commission last evening. <br />There was a lot of mis-information she was able to clear up so the commission members <br />would have a better understanding of the finances of not only the Recreation Fund, but how <br />it fits in with the city funds and needs. Additionally, the appropriations process and <br />budgetary compliance were reviewed. <br />Councilman Gareau, chairperson of the Building, Zoning and Development Committee: 1) <br />The committee met at 6:47 p.m. on February 28, 2007. In attendance were committee <br />members Orlowski, Miller and Gareau; Council members Tallon, Barker and Jones; Mayor <br />4 <br />