Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes of 2/20/2007 <br />Ordinance No. 2007-8 introduced by Mayor O'Grady was given its third reading. An <br />ordinance amending Sections 172.01 and 172.02 of Chapter 172 of the Administrative <br />Code, entitled "Tax Incentive Review Council," in order to bring the sections into <br />compliance with State law, and declaring an emergency. Councilman Tallon moved for <br />adoption. The motion was seconded by Councilman Miller and passed unanimously. <br />Ordinance No. 2007-8 adopted. <br />Ordinance No. 2007-9 introduced by Mayor O'Grady was given its third reading. An <br />ordinance providing for the issuance and sale of $1,410,000 of notes, in anticipation of <br />the issuance of bonds, for the purpose of improving certain designated streets in the City, <br />in cooperation with the Director of Transportation of the State of Ohio and Cuyahoga <br />County and otherwise, by grading, draining, constructing, reconstructing and <br />rehabilitating the pavement base, curbs and sidewalks and adjusting, rehabilitating and <br />reconstructing catch basins, manholes and water valve boxes, where necessary, preparing <br />the surface and surfacing and resurfacing, in each case together with the necessary <br />appurtenances and work incidental thereto. Councilman Tallon moved for adoption. The <br />motion was seconded by Councilman Miller. Roll call: Tallon, yes; Miller, yes; Jones, <br />yes; Barker, yes; Orlowski, yes, with comment that he would like the administration to <br />keep Council apprised of the bid prices on the streets that are listed on this ordinance. <br />Ro11 call continued: Gareau: yes, with comment, that almost one and a half million <br />dollars is being spent to do the street repair. In the past, the city has engaged in similar <br />spending tactics and then failed to actually maintain the streets. He does vote for this, but <br />hopes, by the next time we see any proposed street renovations, we can look forward to a <br />comprehensive street maintenance program so we can get out of the cycle of having <br />short-lived streets which continue to collapse or not meet their usefulness from lack of <br />maintenance. This occurred with the bridge over Rt. 252 where the State of Ohio was <br />going to tell us to pay for the whale thing because we didn't maintain it. We got lucky <br />there with some good work by the administration. If we are not going to maintain the <br />streets after fixing them, then at some point in time harrowing money to fix them <br />becomes kind of irrelevant. He hopes a discussion of how to maintain the streets will be <br />had during the budget hearings. Roll call continued: Ryan, yes, with comment. Since <br />the vote is 6-0, it would be easy for him to vote no and go against the will of Council on <br />this issue. He deeply respects the will of Council on this because the money is coming <br />out of the General Fund ultimately. He has been in the city 35 years and has seen how <br />we handled the Recreation Center, sewer projects, and other projects where much of the <br />money that is paid in interest on these notes goes outside the city. That money does not <br />become part of our city by hiring workers and going into the infrastructure of this city. It <br />deeply troubles him that once again we're on the path of borrowing money to do <br />something this year, but we're going to have to pay for it for 10 or 20 years. There has to <br />come a point in time where we have to start saying no. He has discussed this with the <br />Finance Director who provided helpful information. He defers to her and to Council, and <br />he assumes that Council has also taken a very careful look at this and feels this is the way <br />to go. He is deeply troubled in voting yes, but he has to defer to Council and assume they <br />know what they are doing on this. The motion passed unanimously. Ordinance No. <br />2007-9 adopted. Councilman Miller commented that Mr. Gareau had made very good <br />points about the importance of street maintenance. Another issue which he, Mr. Limpert, <br />8 <br />