My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/02/2008 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
12/02/2008 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:27 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 11:04:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
12/2/2008
Year
2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 12/2/2008 <br />should go to Washington and ask for some bailout money so we can keep the safety <br />forces working in our community. This is a crucial time, and we need the safety forces <br />now more than ever. Mayor O'Grady commented that he did not say he was underpaid. <br />He did go to the international court of justice at the Hague, as a representative of the <br />Mayors for Peace organization, where world peace was discussed. He was there on the <br />anniversary of a determination that we should move towards a world that is nuclear free. <br />He took that trip because he felt it was very important, and it was not at city expense. <br />2) Bill Saringer, 6256 Surrey Drive, a North Olmsted police offer and lifelong resident <br />thanked Mr. Lambert for his comments and said the safety forces appreciated it. He <br />wished to speak about a critical issue every resident in North Olmsted is facing at this <br />time. The city has sent layoff letters to five full-time North Olmsted police officers <br />notifying them that they would be laid off from their employment as police officers <br />effective midnight December 31, 2008. By those letters, the city has indicated that, as of <br />January 1, 2009, the citizens in this city will be denied the full protection that they pay <br />for, that they deserve, and that they need. With those letters, the city has sent a message <br />to the public indicating that it's going to reduce the overall cost of government by <br />jeopardizing the safety of the community. The elected officials whose duty it is to protect <br />and serve all the citizens of North Olmsted must not allow this injustice to occur. He <br />realizes today's economy is not good; however, we cannot turn our backs on the fact that <br />with an economic downturn comes an increase in crime. Our community statistics show <br />from 2006 to 2007 to the present day in 2008, all theft offenses have gone up, crimes <br />against persons are up, and we continue to battle criminal activity involving drugs right <br />here in North Olmsted. The Mayor's decision to cut five full-time police officers when <br />the department is already down two, with another retiring soon, and one soon to be <br />deployed to Iraq, is a serious public safety issue for the citizens of North Olmsted. With <br />the layoff of five full-time police officers, residents can expect an increase of police <br />response time and a decrease in vital services offered by the police division due to a lack <br />of personnel. Laying off five officers will result in the reduction of each shift's <br />manpower, ultimately reducing the number of officers on the streets. With the decrease <br />in manpower, response times will suffer. In emergencies, we may have to rely on <br />neighboring jurisdictions to provide assistance from much farther away, inevitably taking <br />much longer to respond. As a police officer and a resident of North Olmsted, he wants <br />someone responding from his city in an emergency situation. It is extremely important to <br />maintain the current staffing level of the safety forces to insure that the level of protection <br />expected by the residents stays the same for North Olmsted. Having been involved as a <br />member of the FOP negotiating team for the current collective bargaining agreement and <br />as a current member of the FOP negotiating team, they have been receptive and willing to <br />work with the city administration. This potentially damaging move, however, was never <br />discussed during negotiations of the current contract, passed by Council in March of <br />2008. As a police officer, the commitment and focus is on making North Olmsted a safe, <br />thriving community in which you can raise a family, be employed and retire knowing that <br />you live in a safe community. They are asking the elected representatives to prioritize <br />their commitment to the citizens of North Olmsted by focusing on public safety. He is <br />hopeful that the Mayor's layoff letters to the five police officers were mere notices and <br />will not be implemented by prioritizing the city's budget to protect the public's safety. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.