My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/02/2008 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
12/02/2008 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:27 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 11:04:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
12/2/2008
Year
2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 12/2/2008 <br /> <br />5% is reduced to $12,105 per year from $12,742 as introduced. The projected <br />savings for all four years for all five seats is $12,740. <br />• Ordinance 2008-146, an ordinance establishing and fixing the compensation for <br />the Mayor of the City of North Olmsted for the term of office commencing <br />January 1, 2010 and ending December 31, 2013 and declaring an emergency as <br />amended. As it states, this is the compensation range for the office of Mayor of <br />the city of North Olmsted. As introduced originally, the legislation called for a <br />10% decrease in pay, which from 2009 to 2010 would result in the compensation <br />going from $96,928 down to $87,235 in 2010. It would then remain flat for four <br />straight years. Again, the administration, through assistance of the directors, went <br />through a significant amount of research to demonstrate that the compensation for <br />the office of Mayor was in fact not disproportionate with what other communities <br />of a similar size and similar economic structure were paying. Again, the Mayor <br />expressed support that the position not be decreased and that in fact be locked in <br />at a four year wage freeze. Discussion broke into two camps: those who felt a <br />four year freeze was warranted and those who felt that there should be some <br />reduction, whether it be a 5% or 10%, given the economy and the inability to <br />change it once it is established. A majority of Council was expressing the opinion <br />that a more conservative approach would be in line. The Mayor did feel that the <br />number selected, 5%, was arbitrary. Mr. Barker expressed a position that a <br />reduction in pay showed leadership in a difficult time. The committee did <br />recommend a compromise amount of 5%, which results in the compensation for <br />the office of Mayor being reduced from the 2009 amount of $96,928 to $92,082. <br />The projected savings over four years is $19,384.40. <br />• Ordinance 2008-145, an ordinance establishing and fixing the compensation for <br />the Director of Finance for the City of North Olmsted for the term of office <br />commencing January 1, 2010 and ending December 31, 2013 and declaring an <br />emergency. This sets the compensation for the Director of Finance. As <br />introduced, the pay was originally supposed to take a 10% pay reduction from <br />$94,810 down to $87,235. As with the office of Mayor, it was a similar <br />argument. However, it was pointed out that, with respect to the Director of <br />Finance position, that position was previously eligible for longevity pay. At the <br />beginning of this year, City Council removed that position from a position eligible <br />for longevity pay. Obviously, the compensation of the person holding the office <br />cannot be reduced in term. So, the longevity pay is abolished as of the beginning <br />of 2010 for the person holding the office. It was argued and suggested that <br />position had already been forced to incur a pay reduction based upon the <br />abolishment of the longevity pay. It was also argued and presented by the <br />administration with similar statistics from other communities, that unlike the <br />office of Mayor, the office of Law and Finance required specific educational <br />backgrounds in order for an individual to hold that office-they were professional <br />positions which required a certain background and experience. One resident felt <br />that this was retaliatory, that perhaps City Council was being punitive in nature <br />and acting out against those individuals in a political way. The point was made <br />and noted to those in attendance that not all the financial cards were laying on the <br />table. It was difficult for Council to speak about a financial situation because they <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.