Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Minutes 10-21-2008 <br /> <br />pay cuts to save their jobs. They have a hard time deciding on whether to buy gas or food <br />or how will they be able to pay their mortgage. I am a business owner who has had to <br />make some tough choices to help keep my business going since 2002. It has been pay <br />cuts of 20 to 40% and also raising deductibles on our hospitalization to $3,000 per person <br />before Medical Mutual kicks in. We do not have prescription, dental or eye-care. I <br />mentioned earlier my letter to the previous administration. Back then, I mentioned wage <br />freezes, pay cuts for everyone, less hours worked for the week. I had a few people come <br />up to me and say, "you want to take money from my pocket." I said no, I want to save <br />your job. This Council and previous Councils .have been pretty frugal in giving <br />themselves raises, quite less that what employees of the city have received. Why you ask? <br />Because it was the intent of those and this Council to set an example to say, hey things <br />aren't real good. But as you can see, those warnings weren't taken seriously. To cut <br />someone's pay is not an easy thing to do. But when you have cut and trimmed in all <br />possible ways, I think a pay cut is the last resort before you have to let people go. We <br />have heard for quite a while: more with less. I totally understand that, but I'think we <br />have reached less is less. We haven't replaced people who have retired from our city. To <br />quote President Kevin Kennedy: "No one ever leaves because of low pay and bad <br />benefits." Our residents see three major things that our city does for them: that is, street <br />repair, snow removal and brush pickup. In the past few years, those services are not what <br />they used to be. Why you ask? Because we don't have the personnel we once had in <br />Service or the money that we used to have to do all of those jobs efficiently. We have <br />made strides with hospitalization, workers comp, and contributions from employees, <br />outside engineering and so on. But, the cost of doing business keeps going up and the <br />revenues are down. But let's give everyone a raise. In my opinion, in doing that, some <br />may not have a job next year. I am the Councilman for Ward 2; but, when I sit up here <br />and make decisions, I am one of seven trying to do what is best for the residents, not the <br />employees of North Olmsted. I am not just going to look out for a few. We need to see a <br />plan, and until I see one I would rather see the almost `paltry' $16,000 that came from the <br />sale of used oil which hardly affects a $22 million budget go towards ADA <br />improvements at Springvale than to supplement a few people at City Hall. Mayor, we all <br />need to work together to solve the upcoming financial crisis. Presenting us with small <br />pieces that you feel will help f x the big problem and expect our support without seeing a <br />plan is not going to work. Communication between the two bodies of government to help <br />solve huge problems for 2009 is needed. It needs to be done now, not at the end of the <br />year. To my seven colleagues, remember this, we are ultimately responsible for the <br />financial condition of this city. If things go south at the end of this year or into next, it <br />will be Council not the Mayor that will be blamed. My vote is no." The motion failed <br />with four no votes and three yes votes. Ordinance No. 2008-121 is not adopted. <br />Mayor O'Grady asked to be recognized as he felt some statements made were inaccurate <br />and the administration had a responsibility to address them. President Kennedy ruled the <br />votes had been cast, the legislation was not going to be discussed, and the meeting was <br />going to move on. <br />Councilman Mahoney asked for a moment of personal privilege and said, "I wanted to <br />indicate as it pertains to 2008-121 and this will be my final comment, Mr. President. I <br />11 <br />