My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/16/2008 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
09/16/2008 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:31 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 11:05:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
9/16/2008
Year
2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 9/16/2008 <br />last few years. We should be fine for borrowing. The market is tight, but we can rely on <br />that by ourselves. We probably won't be able to buy insurance because she doesn't think <br />anyone except one company has AAA rating any more. <br />2) Her department has worked diligently with the Mayor and his department, directors, <br />division heads, and staff to start the budget process. We are well ahead of where we have <br />been historically in the timing of it. <br />3) She is working on the estimated resources side of the budget process for 2009 and <br />refining it from when she did the tax budget. The municipal income tax through the <br />middle of September, which is August month-end receipts, is down about $444,000 from <br />the prior year to date. The General Fund is 70%; 15% and 15% is Permanent <br />Improvement and Solid Waste and Recycling. The majority is permanent, and about <br />$200,000 of that is withholding and we are probably not going to see that again. The <br />$100,000 is individual and both of those have been consistently down. Additionally, <br />$100,000 is in net profits, which fluctuates depending on when companies are paying in <br />their estimates and not paying in their estimates. So that is not really a reliable source as <br />well. The preliminary estimate of property tax collection from the County Tax Budget <br />Commission-considering that we are losing personal property, another set of <br />percentages down, the values and the collectible percent is staying relatively constant at <br />the 96.45% of the values. They also requested to move .1 mill from the Operating <br />General Fund, which is where all the unspecific millage goes to is to Operations, and that <br />is required to go to the Bond Retirement Fund, which equates to about $90,000 of a loss <br />on assessed valuation. Additionally, the state budget was cut about $572,000 in June <br />before their fiscal year end. That's the second time they have had to cut, and those two <br />cuts over the last two years equate to about 10% of their budget. The state sees no turn- <br />around in the near future. They could cut local government funding, they could lower <br />our share of shared taxes, etc. So we need to keep watching that very closely and work <br />with our state legislators to say we need to keep what resources we still have for our local <br />responsibilities. <br />Councilman Gareau, chairperson of the Finance Committee: 1) The committee met on <br />September 8. Present were Council President Kennedy, Councilman Ryan, Council <br />committee member Barker, Councilman Jones, Councilman Orlowski, committee <br />chairman Gareau, Council committee member Kearney; Councilman Mahoney; Law, <br />Finance, Service Directors. Agenda items: <br />• Resolution 2008-110, a resolution authorizing the Director of Public Service to <br />advertise for bids for lawn mowing services in accordance with plans and <br />specifications on file in his office; further authorizing the Mayor to enter into an <br />agreement for said services with the lowest and best bidder subject to approval by <br />the Board of Control. There were a number of questions concerning the <br />outsourcing or subcontracting of such services that are currently provided by <br />employees within the city. Questions presented included the potential for layoffs, <br />the appropriateness of such a course of action in light of the bargaining <br />agreement, costs issues associated with actual services being provided by our own <br />staff versus what potential savings could be if we were to use outside staff. The <br />question was raised as to whether or not we should have part-time or summer help <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.