My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/02/2008 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
09/02/2008 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:31 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 11:05:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
9/2/2008
Year
2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 9/2/2008 <br />and 2005 compazed to what we have currently. That is where he is coming up with the <br />$200,000. She understands where he is saying that because she did tell Council in the <br />committee meeting that last year was not really a representative yeaz. He was comparing <br />the projected year end, and he wasn't looking at the outside architectural engineering that <br />includes other engineering projects. He was just looking at the engineering costs. He <br />was comparing the $304,000 projected year end of 2008 to the 2005 and 2004 $520,000. <br />That's where he was looking at the $200,000 difference. <br />Mayor O'Grady said he would emphasize it's in his mind and it's in the books. The last <br />time we had an Engineering Department compared to what we've done this year, we're <br />looking at a saving of $200,000. That Engineering Department was very much pazed <br />down the way it was. If you go back to when we had a full Engineering Department, the <br />savings are on the order of $350,000. You can't compare this yeaz to 2006 where we had <br />no city engineer for a period or to 2007 when we were in the transition and still had a <br />department but we outsourced the city engineer position. To do a pure direct comparison <br />of city engineer, what we currently have versus full in-house engineering, the savings <br />exceed $200,000. <br />Councilman Gareau, chairperson of the Finance Committee: 1) The committee met on <br />August 26, 2008. Present were Council President Kennedy, Councilman Ryan, <br />committee member Councilman Barker, Councilman Jones, Councilman Orlowski, <br />committee member Councilman Gazeau, committee member Council Kearney, and <br />Councilman Mahoney; Finance Director Copfer, Safety Director Dr. Thomas, Human <br />Resources Director Farver, Sharon Schlemmer from the WWTP. Three pieces of <br />legislation were discussed: <br />• Ord. 2008-104, an ordinance amending the organizational chart of the WWTP <br />section of the Division of Public Works in the Department of Public Service in <br />order to deliver services from the said division in a more efficient and economical <br />manner and declaring an emergency as amended. This was abring-back; it had <br />been previously discussed in the Finance Committee. At the first discussion, the <br />committee requested some additional information by way of the pay range and <br />pay rates to be implemented. The following piece of legislation to be discussed is <br />the companion piece of legislation setting the pay ranges. This effort is a result of <br />the ATS engineering study that was undertaken in the course of the past several <br />years, and it is part of the reorganization of the WWTP facility. Our <br />superintendent felt this was going to take a little bit of time to determine whether <br />or not the current organizational chart as is being implemented would work <br />because it is involved with people merging job responsibilities. It's going to take <br />a little bit of time to ensure that it is going to work. She said employees were <br />being very proactive and going out and taking the responsibilities seriously and <br />being diligent and aggressive in how they were going to attack all these new <br />responsibilities, and that was encouraging. She did put the caveat out there that it <br />would be a little more time to find out whether or not some of these particular <br />changes would actually work best. In committee, Councilman Gazeau made the <br />motion to recommend approval as amended. The motion was seconded by <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.