Laserfiche WebLink
G <br />Council Minutes of 4/1/2008 <br />of legislation, everybody ought to be able to feel good about it and be willing to vote for it. <br />Wants Council to know at least one resident is awaze that they aze putting in time over and above <br />the call of duty in their own lives to get things done and trying to do the best they can. Mayor <br />O'Grady thanked Mr. Dial for his comments on the foreclosure crisis. At last year's U. S. House <br />of Representatives Select Committee hearing on foreclosures in Cleveland, he was the only <br />mayor to attend, and there were no members of Cleveland City Council present. Last week, he <br />attended a meeting at the Court of Common Pleas regarding this issue and three suburban <br />mayors and three members of Cleveland City Council were in attendance. Attention to the <br />problem is growing. In our city, we recognize the problem and through the work of Assistant <br />Law Director Carole Heyward and Safety Director Lisa Thomas, we are coming out with a very <br />wide-reaching innovative program that's going to protect the property values in our city. Law <br />Director Dubelko addressed Mr. Dial and Mr. Smith and said they are talking about two sides of <br />same coin. The reason we have individual rights and we protect individual rights, is because we <br />have majority rule in this country. All of our laws reflect that majority rules. Along time ago in <br />this country, we carved out certain areas where government just can't go. The city is attempting <br />to protect property values by passing real property maintenance laws and finding new ways to <br />enforce them officially. At the same time, we have to make sure we don't tread on individual <br />rights. With respect to Ordinance 20U8-44, the Law Dept. changed language which he thought <br />did have the potential to tread on some individual rights with respect to property inspectors going <br />onto property and infringing upon Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unlawful, <br />unreasonable searches and seizures. A change was made in the ordinance that would require our <br />inspectors to go into court and get a search warrant before they go onto property without consent <br />to conduct property inspections. With respect to Mr. Dial's concerns and people on Council, we <br />are attempting to implant a better real property program because we were concerned about <br />what's going on-not just in the foreclosure crisis, but in North Olmsted in general. We're an <br />aging community with changing demographics. We're hying to balance those to keep it a <br />healthy, good community with good housing stock, a good mix of residents living within the <br />city, in a friendly, neighborly way and at the same time protecting individual rights. Councilman <br />Gazeau noted with regard to foreclosures that on the webpage for the Cuyahoga County Clerk of <br />Courts, you can do a seazch by zip code to find every house that is in foreclosure in North <br />Olmsted. It is important to know that because residents should know the houses in their <br />neighborhood that are in foreclosure and perhaps not occupied any longer and keep on eye on <br />them. Our safety forces have taken the initiative to actually have the list of houses that are in <br />foreclosure. Councilman Barker noted, for the record, that the search warrants the Law Director <br />spoke about are for inspectors to go into backyards. It is not to get into a home. <br />4) Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, said the Law Director's message was good. However, he <br />does not agree that the majority rules in this country as we are a representative republic. In <br />conjunction with what Mr. Dial said, in a representative republic we have representatives who do <br />our voting for us. Some of them from time to time do dissent in how they vote. Dissent is very <br />good, and it's healthy for democracy. It would disturb him very much if every time he came to a <br />Council meeting, the agenda was already set before he got there. That would be collaboration <br />and conspiracy before the fact, and he and other citizens would not have the opportunity to <br />express their opinions. He respects those who vote affirmatively for things, and he also respects <br />those who vote negatively for things. Each of them has a reason, and it provides the opportunity <br />to hear what those reasons are and perhaps form our own opinions because of that. <br />6 <br />..~ <br />