My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/20/2009 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
11/20/2009 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:46 AM
Creation date
1/6/2014 11:29:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
11/20/2009
Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 10-20-2009 <br />LJ <br />2) The committee discussed Chapter 505 to discuss dog issues in the city and how many <br />dogs may be too many to have at a residence. Pros and cons were discussed and the issue <br />was held in committee. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />1) Ken Hehnen, 2810 Gibson Drive, Rocky River said he is here tonight as a member of <br />North Olmsted Firefighters Local 1267, and he's currently a lieutenant and EMS officer <br />for the North Olmsted Fire Department. He's here tonight because recently President <br />Kennedy was at one of their union meetings. At the meeting, they discussed the impact <br />of the layoffs of the five firefighters in the past. President Kennedy indicated that neither <br />he nor Council knew of any ill effects from those layoffs. No one has come forth to tell <br />Council, and he suggested that the firefighters come to Council meetings and talk about <br />this. Mr. Hehnen said he feels it's really the Fire Chief's responsibility to talk about <br />safety, but for some reason, Council doesn't seem to be getting the information. If <br />Council is not aware of the safety hazards that have occurred by the cut-backs, it is his <br />duty to come forward and tell Council. There are only three firefighters on duty at Fire <br />Station Number Two. That's not enough firefighters as paramedics to manage many <br />medical emergencies; the highest risk medical emergencies -people not breathing, <br />people with no heartbeat, people that are unconscious. These calls don't happen very <br />often. They are a small percentage of the calls. There are other calls that are just as <br />severe that we need these people. They need five people on the scene initially to manage <br />these people effectively. They provide advanced cardiac life support to these heart attack <br />victims. They are held to the same level of standard that routine physicians are held to <br />and the accountability and the protocols. When they arrive with only three people, it is <br />very difficult to meet those standards and document it properly. They do call for help <br />from the east end of town, but is takes eight minutes on average for them to come out and <br />help. They are doing the best we can, but patient care is suffering. He can itemize all <br />the runs with permission from the Chief. He and Captain Ciarrone came to the safety <br />caucus about a year ago to warn of these hazards. Once or twice ~ week there are one of <br />these very severe medical emergencies that, with only three people to manage, are true <br />life and death emergencies. Care is being compromised. There has been a drastic effect <br />on patients' care by the lack of those other firefighters. It happens mainly at Station Two. <br />Often, the east end is chasing out of the west end to help out, leaving the east end <br />uncovered. They have had full arrest calls that we only manage with three people and we <br />never got the extra back up. This is going to be a very tough flu season, and resources <br />will be overwhelmed. The message here is the layoffs have had a detrimental effect on <br />safety, and further layoffs will be catastrophic. <br />2) Jeffrey Sturgeon, 3092 W. 231, asked for an update regarding the dogs allowed to be <br />in the park Ordinance. It seems to have come to a stop. It was brought to Council's <br />attention in August, there was a first reading on it, a committee meeting on it, and <br />Council was given plenty of information on it. He asked why at the last Council meeting <br />Councilman Mahoney wanted to meet with the Mayor after the meeting. He said there is <br />no reason to have a meeting after a public meeting, and have there been any private <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.