My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/01/2009 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
09/01/2009 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:49 AM
Creation date
1/7/2014 3:09:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
9/1/2009
Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 9/1/Z009 <br />She announced that the library is now closed on Sundays. Residents needing library <br />services on Sunday can use the Fairview Park branch from 1 to S p.m. <br />3) Matt Peters, 32869 Sorrento Lane, Avon Lake, a member of the North Olmsted fire <br />fighters local. Recently ahalf--year report was supplied to Council by the Finance and <br />Safety Directors. It contains some interesting numbers: runs are on pace to equal last <br />year's record-setting high numbers. Even though we are just on pace for the equal <br />amount of run numbers, our EMS transports are up. So, billable transports are up and <br />you also can possibly equate that with the more serious nature of some of those runs. <br />Each of the last four months has equaled or surpassed the transports of 2008's numbers. <br />The fire loss for 2009 has already surpassed 2008's total by at least IO%, and we're only <br />about half way through the fire season. Most fires occur in the cooler seasons of the year. <br />If you look at some of those numbers, you still see the demand-the demand is there; the <br />runs are there; the importance is there. The department has attempted to handle the runs <br />as best and as professionally as they can, and they always will. They will try and work <br />through whatever staffing levels are supplied. Regarding comments made at the August <br />18 Council meeting about regional dispatch and possible incorporating into regional <br />fire-the union has never had a ,problem with making their thoughts known, and they <br />have been present at many of the meetings-if they changed their opposition to moving <br />to a central dispatch or had any problems with current dispatch, which they do not. We <br />have excellent dispatch services here in the city. There was some mention in the minutes <br />that maybe they regretted not going to central dispatch. He thinks that's in error. We <br />have excellent dispatchers. He thinks changing over to central dispatch and regionalizing <br />the dispatch adds a layer, which will only increase our response times. If that is part of <br />the regional dispatch and regional fire service that is presented and ultimately obtained <br />with the consultants, so be it. It may be part of gxowth and how we operate in the future. <br />But moving towards that now, he doesn't think the union supports that at all. He just <br />wanted to make note of that. <br />4) Jerome Barrett, 24125 LeBern Drive, commented about an article in the Plain Dealer <br />this morning. The headline was, "The Ohio Public Pension Systems Consider Unpopular <br />Changes." The article goes on to describe the large amount of money that the pension <br />funds have lost because of the economic conditions. One example is the State Teachers <br />Retirement System lost $24.1 billion. The pension funds are going to meet, and they <br />listed five things they're looking at because the liability has to be funded, theoretically, <br />for 30 years. The changes being considered are a possible increase to the minimum <br />retirement age; increase the number of years used to calculate the final average salary <br />from three to five; eliminate, reduce or delay annual cost of living adjustments; eliminate <br />the lump sum death benefit; increase the employee and employer contributions to the <br />system. He asked Mrs. Copfer if she had stated in January that there was talk of <br />increasing the employer contribution from 19 to 24%. Mrs. Copfer answered yes for the <br />police as fire is already at 24%. He questioned if these changes would have an impact on <br />our city and other cities in the state. Regarding 2009-12, he believes there is a correlation <br />there. Mrs. Copfer said she had not read the article. She will look into it, but it will be a <br />direct impact to our budgets. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.