My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/18/2009 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
08/18/2009 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:50 AM
Creation date
1/7/2014 3:09:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
8/18/2009
Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 8/18/2009 <br />and Center Ridge Road. Based on those results, we'll come back to City Council with <br />that. Mr. Sturgeon said he couldn't come up with any real benefit of what the city would <br />gain by raising that speed limit. He can think of a number of things why we shouldn't do <br />it for safety reasons. Mayor O'Grady said it is fairness to the motoring public. It's trying <br />to be responsible and do what is just. Regarding allowing dogs in the park, he <br />wholeheartedly agrees with Mr. Sturgeon. People should be able to bring their pets in the <br />parks, but they should be required to keep them on a leash and clean up after them. He <br />knows that city crews have to clean up after dogs in the park now. The people who are <br />letting their dogs run in the parks are doing that improperly. There are law abiding <br />citizens who should be afforded the same opportunity to bring their pets, but they would <br />do it the right way. He would encourage Council to take that up. If there's any way the <br />city administration can assist, he would welcome the opportunity. President Kennedy <br />commented that Mr. Mahoney will probably take that up in his Recreation Committee. <br />Commenting on the issue of health care, Mayor O'Grady said the legislation that is <br />before Council is simply encouraging reform, and that is what's needed. Right now, our <br />citizens are suffering. Reform must happen. The reality is that the insurance industry is <br />one of the most profitable industries in the United States of America. The insurance <br />industry takes 24 cents out of every dollar to provide services. The government through <br />Medicare takes about 3 cents on every dollar. The insurance companies are not going to <br />regulate themselves. And until we actually put in regulations to start controlling costs, <br />our people are going to continue to suffer. When the time comes to vote, he would ask <br />that Council look favorably upon this and think about the people who are having a <br />difficult time. We have great delivery of medicine in our nation, but we have an <br />incredibly poor system of charging for it. It's too expensive. <br />6) Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, said he concurs wholeheartedly with the Mayor <br />regarding that issue. It is apropos to the people of North Olmsted directly. A gentleman <br />last tr%~:eting stood up here and said he had no job and no health insurance, but he didn't <br />agree with it. He is not so sure he would want to be in that gentleman's position. Most <br />people are just a few medical treatments away from losing everything they have if they <br />have to make one trip to the hospital. And our citizens are directly impacted right here in <br />North Olmsted. <br />7) Terry Smith, 26615 Fairfax, is against the universal health care. He thinks a lot of our <br />health problems have been caused by the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid. That's <br />a whole other subject, which he'd like to proceed further in some other forum. He <br />guesses he is promoting health care reform too. Health care reform could mean anything. <br />Regarding the signage, it seems like cooperation between businesses and local <br />government and schools to create the signs is a good thing. It could even go further-he <br />thinks any business should be able to put out signs. Again, it's their property. It's <br />individual rights. Why shouldn't they be allowed to put signs where they want, what <br />they want up there, as high as they want to? Some of these zoning laws go against <br />individual rights. As far as charging the people to put the banners across, that's not the <br />right direction. Let them put the banners across, but let everyone else put out signs too. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.