My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/02/2009 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2009
>
06/02/2009 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2014 8:50:52 AM
Creation date
1/7/2014 3:30:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
6/2/2009
Year
2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Council Minutes of 6/2/2009 <br />6,~r <br />and protect the value of our homes that is second to none anywhere. Don't be misled by <br />a couple of numbers that can sway one way or another at any given yeax. Look at more <br />regular statistics that have been presented recently by the County. Councilman Gareau <br />wondered if a study has been done on whether or not one of North Olmsted's greatest <br />assets in the past 10 years has now turned into somewhat of a liability in the past year or <br />two: that being affordable, quality housing that was very attractive to buyers from the <br />mid-90's all the way up through 2006. People were able to get a great range of housing <br />in the city from $115,000 to upwards of half a million dollars. The question is who was <br />buying? Were the buyers not as qualified. as they should have been? Perhaps time will <br />ultimately bear this out. But now we are dealing with foreclosures-more than what <br />Fairview Park has. We are also dealing with recycling of houses being sold at sheriff's <br />sales for less than their original value. He wonders to what extent the affordable housing <br />that was here and the lending standards that were used brought about the current <br />situation. We still have a good, quality housing stock in the community. But it's taken a <br />beating based upon the fact that somebody could come in and buy a home from a bank <br />and pay less than a resident is asking for their home. Mayor O'Grady said it will be <br />useful down the road for further analysis when we get those studies. But don't be tricked <br />by numbers. Do we have more foreclosures than Fairview Park? Of course, we do. <br />We're more than twice their size. We have more than twice their number of residences. <br />That's yet another factor that comes into play. It's a difficult time. The foreclosure crisis <br />has pushed down the value of homes-9% in Fairview Park, 10% in North Olmsted. It is <br />important to wait until we get a detailed analysis that really shows us how much ground <br />have we lost, are we behind anybody, or are we right with everybody. In the meantime, <br />everyone-residents and government officials alike-should do everything in their power <br />to make sure we maintain the values of our properties. That is what we are doing. <br />4} Dennis Lambert, 25057 Carey Lane, speaking on the housing issue said the County <br />uses a sampling of houses and doesn't take anall-across-the-board average. From what <br />he understands, the article in the Plain Dealer was an average of actual sales they <br />averaged in and then did a comparison. A little more extensive and a little more <br />complete for that purpose. It was very telling. To understand where we are going, we <br />have to look at where we've been. For the last 35 years, this city has been stagnating <br />while other cities around us have grown in value. We're surrounded by suburbs that <br />basically have had a 1 % hit. The percentage of change is important. Some cities are <br />down 1%--Westlake, Fairview Park. Westlake has been going along for years planning <br />and promoting wise use of land. Mr. Kennedy was asking the right question about what's <br />going to happen this year. It's going to be interesting to see if the citizens are asked for a <br />tax increases to get things done. Because so much of what has been done in the past has <br />been waste of time: over expenditures on the wrong things, and not focusing on getting <br />the job done for the people, more politics. Eileen Patton is truly the mayor's mayor. She <br />is a Democrat, but she has brought on some of the best Republicans she can to do things. <br />She worked between parties. She gets everything done and has very strict rules about <br />City Hall and politics-they just don't mix in that community. North Olmsted has played <br />too much politics. The city has had a wonderfizl influx of cash over the last 35 years, and <br />it's all been wasted. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.