Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Minutes of 4/7/2009 <br />+4 <br />Whereas in light of the foregoing, it is the desire of the Council to create new <br />Section 331.43 of the Traffic Code which will prohibit excessive idling of motor <br />vehicle engines in the City. The committee amended the legislation to include the <br />following (in exceptions): "A North Olmsted city government vehicle is engaged <br />in a city government operation that necessitates the idling of the vehicle's engine <br />for more than five (S) minutes within a sixty (60) minute period." Councilman <br />Orlowski and Councilwoman Jones brought the legislation to Council's attention <br />after hearing representatives of the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating <br />Agency speak on this at the Northeast Ohio City Council Association's annual <br />meeting in February, and also after having to deal with an incident in Ward IV <br />with a truck idling excessively and disrupting a neighborhood. Amy Wainright <br />from NOACA stated that northeast Ohio violates clean air standards, and by 2010 <br />we must come into compliance with the old standards. By 2013, we must meet <br />the new standards that are laid out by the EPA. In addition, a report was issued <br />that points out that 22% of the area's total population is living in a diesel hotspot, <br />with North Olmsted being in the so-called "dirty dozen" or the top twelve <br />communities with people living in diesel hotspots. In order to comply with clean <br />air standards, NOACA is recommending that cities across northeast Ohio <br />implement traffic signal synchronizations and idle reduction strategies. North <br />Olmsted is already working on traffic signal timing schemes and hopefully this <br />ordinance will help remove us from the dirty dozen. After discussing pros and <br />cons, the committee voted 3-0 to recommend approval. Councilman Kearney <br />moved to amend Ordinance 2009-34 as presented. The motion was seconded by <br />Councilman Orlowski and passed unanimously. Ordinance No. 2009-34 <br />amended. <br />AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION <br />1) Bee Sidaway, 28675 Holly Drive, asked if the city had applied for stimulus grants for <br />replacing safety forces. Mayor O'Grady replied the city administration continues to look <br />in every direction they can to bring in revenue to the city during these difficult times. <br />They have initiated work on a COPS grant that would bring in police officers and are <br />working in a similar vein with regard to fire fighters. In this economy, they believe it's <br />not going to be dollars that can be used to bring people back, which they would like, but <br />dollars that would reduce the potential for future layoffs. The right thing was done over <br />three and a half years-the city was reorganized and made 10% smaller asfar asfull-time <br />employees. Every year, $l.ti million was saved through intelligent reorganization <br />without a single layoff. When the economy crashed at the end of last year, there was <br />nothing to be done. It was no longer in the hands of the administration-the dollars <br />weren't there. The only thing that would have stopped layoffs at that time was <br />reasonable concessions from the bargaining units, from the fire fighters' union, from the <br />police officers' unions. Those were not forthcoming, and the layoffs happened. We need <br />concessions. Salaries are too high; benefits are too expensive. When we have an average <br />fire fighter's salary of $80,000 a year; average benefits for one person of $112,000 a year, <br />it's too much. The way to bring people back potentially is reasonable concessions from <br />the unions. Mrs. Sidaway said she understood a police arbitration would take place on <br />8 <br />~~~~~ <br />