My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/17/2019 Meeting Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Minutes
>
2019
>
12/17/2019 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2020 3:55:40 PM
Creation date
2/6/2020 3:55:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
North Olmsted Legislation
Legislation Date
12/17/2019
Year
2019
Legislation Title
December 17, 2019 Council Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes of 12-17-2019 <br />within a year. Giant Eagle today announced they are going to do theirs in five. I believe <br />with this legislation we are creating a problem to solve a problem. We are expressing <br />concern that there will be confusion that Cuyahoga County will have a standard and <br />everyone else will have a different standard. Now there is a third standard in Brooklyn <br />and a fourth standard in Independence and we are somewhere in between the two of them <br />so whether you want to say we are the fourth or fifth standard, I don't know that we are <br />helping matters here. As has been stated, I think the State and the County are going to <br />end up settling this matter and not us. So to be going forward with this legislation what <br />we are really achieving is branding the City as anti -environmental. We are a City that is <br />going to be dependent on its success over the next decades on whether new families will <br />be moving in here and I don't think this helps. Thank you. <br />Councilwoman Hemann voted yes with comment. I would first of all thank Mr. Miller for <br />attending this evening. Apparently Nan Baker is a little too busy as our representative to <br />have come. Thank you for picking up her slack. My yes vote is just based on a few <br />things. Not that it matters to anybody, but I do home canning, everything from scratch. I <br />am actually environmentally friendly. I do care greatly about the environment, I do think <br />however, that I don't have enough confidence in Cuyahoga County at this point to rely <br />solely on them. Fifty thousand bags they are going to distribute is nothing. Nothing, Mr. <br />Miller to solve what you are trying to solve. I don't think the County has the resources to <br />do that. I don't think the County has the stamina to continue that. While we would like to <br />be their partner in that, they did not communicate to us. Ms. Baker certainly should have <br />contacted us. When we did have Mr. Greenspan, he was quite notably in our City pretty <br />often. I don't quite get that part. Maybe the League of Women Voters will take note of <br />that. But, to suggest that the County is going to take care of this for everyone is just not <br />true. I do not believe that. I believe that it takes all of us to do that. I am not happy with <br />our legislation as it stands. As the chairperson of the committee, my concern was in fact <br />going forward on January 1 and the confusion that might cause. While that does not seem <br />a good reason to all of you, it certainly is to me as I get a lot of phone calls. I am actually <br />looking forward toward revamping our legislation and/or rescinding it when the County <br />really proves this is their solution, they are going to stick with it and they are going to <br />help every city that they are putting this ban in place and let's work together and do that. <br />But for the moment, I have to rely on us. I am yes, for those reasons. <br />Councilman Limpert voted yes with comment. As you can see in the audience we have a <br />very broad breadth of reasons and I don't think any of us here are saying that we don't <br />think banning plastic bags at some point isn't a good idea. But there are a lot of complex <br />issues with this. With that I wanted to thank the very few city residents I corresponded <br />with via e-mail and the several county residents that called me about this issue. I think the <br />County is doing a great job of being a leader and trying to be a conduit to formalize some <br />legislation around a very complex issue that is difficult to move forward. As people in the <br />audience have stated this has been discussed for several years. I think only through <br />initiating that conversation can we really gain momentum and have a detailed dialogue <br />that needs to happen in order to have good legislation and good communication with <br />residents. I want to thank the County for that. As we have noted there have been some <br />bumps on the way, but from a macro perspective this is really a good thing. Given the <br />largest municipality in the state has delayed opting in to this for six months and the <br />county is still pending legislation on their own to delay, I am echoing what other people <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.