8/4/2020 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED AUGUST 4, 2020 Present: Council President Jones, Council Members Brossard, Glassburn, Hemann, Kelly, Limpert, Schumann & Williamson Also Present: Mayor Kennedy, Director of Finance Copfer, Director of Human Resources Gallo, Director of Law Gareau, Director of Planning & Community Development Lieber and Clerk of Council Massarolo Council President Jones called the meeting to order at 8:13 p.m. through GoToMeeting. Due to the meeting being a virtual meeting, Council President Jones requested if any member of the public using a computer wished to address Council to notify the Clerk via the chat feature in GoToMeeting and they would be called on later in the meeting. For those dialing in via phone, the lines would be unmuted during the appropriate portion of the meeting. Council President Jones requested a moment of silence in remembrance of former Mayor Musial, who passed away during the July recess. The Council Meeting Minutes of June 16, 2020 were approved as written. The Special Council Meeting Minutes of June 23, 2020 were approved as written. The Special Council Meeting Minutes of June 25, 2020 were approved as written. The Special Council Meeting Minutes of June 30, 2020 were approved as written. The following legislation will be considered for passage under suspension of the rules this evening: First Reading: Resolution 2020-74 and Ordinances 2020-75, 2020-76, 2020- 86, 2020-87, 2020-88, 2020-89, 2020-90, 2020-91. REPORTS Mayor Kennedy: • No Report. Director of Law Gareau: • In regards to Mayor Musial, I had an opportunity to start working with him in 1998 and he had a long and meaningful life. He gave much to the community over the years. He was on the Planning Commission, Council and served as Mayor. He also had a long history with the Boy Scouts and made many generous donations to the community. • The City of North Olmsted was named as a defendant in a mandamus action in the 81" District Court of Appeals. It is to have the court order the City to start a prosecution. It has been dismissed once already, the person modified it slightly