Laserfiche WebLink
James A & Florence J Burns <br />3978 Dover Center Rd <br />North Olmsted, OH 44070-1704 <br />Council, Mayor, Econimic Development Director <br />Burns (Personal) <br />he: Ordinance 2024-62 - Planned Development Zoning District <br />This ordinance would create a new zoning district called Planned Development. "Planned Development <br />(PD) zoning is intended to encourage orderly development and redevelopment of property zoned One <br />Family Residence or Residential Office District while allowing more Flexibility in design to achieve high <br />quality, integrated site planning not otherwise possible under the constraints of normal zoning <br />requirements" (Sec. 1157.01). This intent paragraph tells you why Planned Development zoning is a <br />duplication of existing zoning and that the purpose of this zoning classification is to circumvent <br />development requirements already in place in the Zoning Code for such things as setbacks, parking <br />requirements and building location. <br />We have in the Zoning Code One and Two Family Residence (Sec. 1135), Residential Office (Sec. 1142) <br />and Mixed Use (Sec. 1149) Districts. Title Seven of the Building and Zoning Code (Additional Zoning <br />Requirements) and Part Thirteen of the Codified Ordinances (Building Code) put in place development <br />requirements that protect the health and welfare of our residents and visitors to our city. The Planned <br />Development Zoning proposed in this ordinance would not create a new zoning category but would <br />combine two existing categories into a categoriy that would allow "flexibility" from the existing <br />requirements to "integrate site planning not otherwise possible under the constraints of normal zoning <br />requirements." In other words, it allows the developer to circumvent the Zoning Code and Building <br />Code without having to go through the variance process. <br />At the committee meeting it was said that our zoning laws are obsolete and antiquated. He indicated <br />that new and fresh deevelopment ideas are needed to show "sensitivity to cultural, environmental and <br />economic considerations." Our Zoning Code has developed over time. Periodically it has been reviewed <br />and amended where needed to keep it current with our city's residential, retail and business <br />environment. It is not stagnant or old. Our city has been substatially developed for decades. New <br />developments and major improvements to existing properties are required to meet existing zoning and <br />building requirements to be compatible with the other properties around them. This ordinance would <br />allow the creation of areas that throw out existing requirements so that the developer can build a <br />development in any manner he wants and which may not be compatible with ajouning properties. <br />As mentioned in the whereasses, this zoning variation is being introduced because of a specific <br />development the former Forest Elementary School property. If passed, Planned Develoment Zoning <br />would be in place for the entire city. Personally, my concern is with the Pine School property. It meets <br />all the requirements to be changed to a Planned Development zoned property. <br />